+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Led Zeppelin 1, 11 & 4 Original v Modern RePress

  1. #1
    Join Date: Aug 2016

    Location: Kent UK

    Posts: 223
    I'm Paul.

    Default Led Zeppelin 1, 11 & 4 Original v Modern RePress

    Hi all

    A question for those of you that have both the original and the Modern RePress on 180gm Vinyl

    How do they compare.

    I lost my original copies many years ago and just picked up the latest versions and although the originals were played on equipment that was very inferior to what I have today, the reproduction sounds like something is missing.

    Obviously it might be my old equipment coloured the output so much I never really knew what it should sound like, or I am remembering the sound with rose tinted headphone

    So anyone with both how do they compare on your current system.

    Thanks for any input on this

    Paul
    Current setup Thorens TD-160 Mk1 with Denon DL-110 MC Cartridge, Pioneer PD-8700 CD Player, Yamaha AX-592 Amp, Yamaha CDX-810 CD Player, Yamaha KX-480 Cassette Deck, Yamaha TX-492RDS Tuner, Monitor Audio Bronze 5 speakers, Van-Damme Cables throughout.

  2. #2
    Join Date: Oct 2015

    Location: KL, Malaysia

    Posts: 258
    I'm shahrin.

    Default

    i have the new 4. Its superb. theres a 'companion LP' - same songs different recordings or something - the Stairway on it is simply stupendous.
    Also have the new Physical Graffiti - now that is a huge disappointment.
    Thorens td124 mk2 / Bokrand AB309/ 103r
    SLAT L75 / Jelco 850S / AT VM740ML
    Marantz CD63 / Bluesound / Musical Paradise 701 II/ ESP 500Hz eXO / PL Prologue 4 and Nord 1UP amps / JK Wynn semiactive NS1000 upgrade
    /ESP 700 Hz eXO / JBL 4333 components

  3. #3
    Join Date: Dec 2008

    Location: East Riding of Yorkshire these days

    Posts: 4,779
    I'm Shaun.

    Default

    I have the new Zepp I and Zepp II but to be honest it is so long since I heard the originals I cannot really compare. I do though love these re-issues.

  4. #4
    Join Date: Nov 2010

    Location: North West UK

    Posts: 214
    I'm Dave.

    Default

    I find 1 remaster is good, very similar to the original. 3 I found very disappointing and much prefer the original or jap pressing. Because of that I stuck with my jap pressings of 2,4 and graffiti. I found the 'energy' or 'drama' was missing with the remasters. Perhaps a bit too polite.

  5. #5
    Join Date: Aug 2016

    Location: Kent UK

    Posts: 223
    I'm Paul.

    Default

    Too polite, that is a good way of describing it, thought it might have been the old equipment I used to have colouring the sound too much but was not shure.

    Paul
    Current setup Thorens TD-160 Mk1 with Denon DL-110 MC Cartridge, Pioneer PD-8700 CD Player, Yamaha AX-592 Amp, Yamaha CDX-810 CD Player, Yamaha KX-480 Cassette Deck, Yamaha TX-492RDS Tuner, Monitor Audio Bronze 5 speakers, Van-Damme Cables throughout.

  6. #6
    Join Date: Nov 2009

    Location: Malvern Hills, UK

    Posts: 60
    I'm Mike.

    Default

    I have just bought the 40th Anniversary 180g remaster of Physical Graffiti and quite frankly it's shocking. I only played one side and that was painful. The sound is just flat and noisy, lacking any atmosphere and bass. It seems strange when my remasters of I & II are quite the opposite.

    Mike
    Rega RP6/Tangospinner Darienzo/SRM-Tech Ultimate Upgrade/OM2 Black
    UC FLAC/NAS/Cyrus Stream XP2
    Croft Micro 25R/Series 7
    Mark Grant I/C's
    Spendor SP3/1R2
    BK XLS200 Sub

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •