+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 96

Thread: Playing with RCA vs Balanced in my setup

  1. #11
    Join Date: May 2016

    Location: Notts

    Posts: 2,743
    I'm Geoff.

    Default

    On a related note I am planning to get one of these when they are back in stock and a second Raspberry Pi (3)

    http://iqaudio.co.uk/audio/47-pi-dac-pro.html

    This will allow me to bypass another component (my standalone DAC) and stream music directly to my monoblocks via XLR cables.

    I am hopeful that this will further improve the sound of my system.

    Geoff

  2. #12
    RothwellAudio Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brucew268 View Post
    Since one of the loaners i was going to receive was single ended only, in anticipation I switched the Amp to the 'Regular' single ended circuit, via jumper. I used a 1 meter IC directly between DAC and Amp. Volume control is digital using the 64bit in JRiver's player on my server. Then played to see if my 'baseline' sound had changed from the XLR setup. It had.
    Is that a 1m RCA interconnect between DAC and power amp? Does the DAC have an RCA output as well as an XLR output? What is the DAC?
    When you refer to "the XLR setup", is that the previous setup using a balanced pre-amp in the system?

    Quote Originally Posted by brucew268 View Post
    The adapator is http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/111803097651. Pin 3 is jumpered to Pin 1 and chassis.
    There are different ways to create a balanced output but I think most won't take kindly to having pin 3 connected to pin one. Basically, the op-amp (or whatever it is) driving pin 3 is being short circuited, which is not a great idea. Pin 3 being left open circuit would be preferable.

  3. #13
    Join Date: Mar 2012

    Location: West Yorkshire

    Posts: 274
    I'm Bruce.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RothwellAudio View Post
    There are different ways to create a balanced output but I think most won't take kindly to having pin 3 connected to pin one. Basically, the op-amp (or whatever it is) driving pin 3 is being short circuited, which is not a great idea. Pin 3 being left open circuit would be preferable.
    Are you saying that it could be dangerous to the DAC's opamp? My primary point in the OP and Post #8 was that it sounded better than just using the RCA out with the same cable.

    Quote Originally Posted by RothwellAudio View Post
    Is that a 1m RCA interconnect between DAC and power amp? Does the DAC have an RCA output as well as an XLR output? What is the DAC?
    When you refer to "the XLR setup", is that the previous setup using a balanced pre-amp in the system?
    Yes, 1m RCA.
    Yes, as I said, I tried both DAC outputs. Calyx 24/192 DAC.
    Yes, well a preamp seemingly meant by Classe Audio to be the partner to the amp. It has both balanced and single ended inputs and outputs, though the jumper change is only on the amp, not the preamp.
    Bruce

    Theories are not so much answers as questions, to be supported or undermined by experience & testing.

    Source: Audiolab 6000CDT > Calyx 24/192 DAC
    Amplification: Pass-design B1rev2 pre-amplifier > Neurochrome Modulus 686.
    Loudspeakers: Proac Response 1SC
    Cables/stands: spkr: MIT MH-750 biwire; IC: HT Truthlink; Target stands, sand-filled; Excel Cat6A 23AWG UFTP & 1attack.de Cat.7 SFTP.
    Other: Balanced AC transformer to hydra mains distr; Bass traps & Acoustic panels; Isolation: Inner tube & roller bearings; 3xZyxel ES104A switches in series w/Vreg upgrades.

  4. #14
    Join Date: Nov 2013

    Location: Scotland

    Posts: 185
    I'm Michael.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arkless Electronics View Post
    I can make you one... Balanced in and out is I presume what you want?
    Sounds like a good offer to me Balanced phono stages must be pretty rare.

  5. #15
    Join Date: Oct 2012

    Location: NE England

    Posts: 4,173
    I'm Jez.

    Default

    Most op amps are short circuit proof but it is not a good idea to short the output anyway. However, in most cases there will be a resistor after the op amps output which means it's usually ok in practice. Shorting pin 3 to 1 at the receiving end but leaving pin 3 open circuit at the driving end would be best but in any of these cases you are no longer using a balanced connection and the unbalanced should be preferable.

    As an aside here, many balanced items work unbalanced internally and use a "line receiver" and "line driver" IC to convert the unbalanced to balanced at the source and then convert the balanced back to unbalanced at the receiving end. These IC's consist internally of usually a 3 op amp circuit. Sometimes in fact 3 op amps are indeed used at each end in place of the specialised chip... results are about the same.

    My point is? Well in all such equipment using the balanced input and output means in effect taking the unbalanced signal and then feeding it through 3 op amps at each end! Hardly minimising the signal path....

    DAC's tend by their nature to have true balanced outputs anyway (even if no balanced output is provided in your DAC the DAC IC usually works in balanced form) and so in nearly all cases a DAC with balanced outputs IS truly balanced, but the same is not true of pre amps and especially power amps. It is certainly possible to do both in true fully balanced form but it greatly adds to cost and complexity and makes things a bit awkward to use them unbalanced so the "cheat" method which adds the 3 extra op amps at each end is much more common.
    Arkless Electronics-Engineered to be better. Tel. 01670 530674 (after 1pm)

    Modded Thorens TD150, Audio Technica AT-1005 MkII, Technics EPC-300MC, Arkless Hybrid MC phono stage, Arkless passive pre, Arkless 50WPC Class A SS power amp, (or) Arkless modded Leak Stereo 20, Modded Kef Reference 105/3's
    ReVox PR99, Studer B62, Ferrograph Series 7, Tandberg TCD440, Hitachi FT-5500MkI, also FT-5500MkII
    Digital: Yamaha CDR-HD1500 (Digital Swiss army knife-CD recorder, player, hard drive, DAC and ADC in one), PC files via 24/96 sound card and SPDIF, modded Philips CD850, modded Philips CD104, modded DPA Little Bit DAC. Sennheiser HD580 cans with Arkless Headphone amp.
    Cables- free interconnects that come with CD players, mains leads from B&Q, dead kettles etc, extension leads from Tesco

  6. #16
    Join Date: Oct 2012

    Location: NE England

    Posts: 4,173
    I'm Jez.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dauntless View Post
    Sounds like a good offer to me Balanced phono stages must be pretty rare.
    Pretty rare yes but there are a few around. It was just me thinking out loud and seeing if there was any interest really...
    Arkless Electronics-Engineered to be better. Tel. 01670 530674 (after 1pm)

    Modded Thorens TD150, Audio Technica AT-1005 MkII, Technics EPC-300MC, Arkless Hybrid MC phono stage, Arkless passive pre, Arkless 50WPC Class A SS power amp, (or) Arkless modded Leak Stereo 20, Modded Kef Reference 105/3's
    ReVox PR99, Studer B62, Ferrograph Series 7, Tandberg TCD440, Hitachi FT-5500MkI, also FT-5500MkII
    Digital: Yamaha CDR-HD1500 (Digital Swiss army knife-CD recorder, player, hard drive, DAC and ADC in one), PC files via 24/96 sound card and SPDIF, modded Philips CD850, modded Philips CD104, modded DPA Little Bit DAC. Sennheiser HD580 cans with Arkless Headphone amp.
    Cables- free interconnects that come with CD players, mains leads from B&Q, dead kettles etc, extension leads from Tesco

  7. #17
    Join Date: Sep 2009

    Location: west mids, UK

    Posts: 3,271
    I'm Phil.

    Default

    i find that it totally depends on the equipment I am using whether rca or xlr is best . I have 2 very high amps here at the moment and prefer the rca connection [using eichman rfc mercury rca ] as opposed to my rfc hyperion furutech xlr
    ou might slip, you might slide, you might
    Stumble and fall by the road side
    But don't you ever let nobody drag your spirit down
    Remember you're walking up to heaven

    Don't let nobody turn you around
    … Walk with the rich, walk with the poor
    Learn from everyone, that's what life is for
    And don't you let nobody drag your spirit down

    Eric Bibb

  8. #18
    Join Date: Oct 2012

    Location: NE England

    Posts: 4,173
    I'm Jez.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hifinutt View Post
    i find that it totally depends on the equipment I am using whether rca or xlr is best . I have 2 very high amps here at the moment and prefer the rca connection [using eichman rfc mercury rca ] as opposed to my rfc hyperion furutech xlr
    The cables themselves make no difference whatsoever (bizarrely some disagree here apparently). In fact, for cable believers, balanced should theoretically cancel out any "cable sound" as it is the difference between the + & - ("hot and cold") inputs that is amplified by a balanced amplifier and in theory it should be deaf to anything applied identically to the "hot and cold" inputs. In many cases though, as I said above, you have a total of 6 op amps per channel added to the signal path when using balanced. Actual circuit diagrams would need to be consulted to see if particular models do things this way or not.
    Arkless Electronics-Engineered to be better. Tel. 01670 530674 (after 1pm)

    Modded Thorens TD150, Audio Technica AT-1005 MkII, Technics EPC-300MC, Arkless Hybrid MC phono stage, Arkless passive pre, Arkless 50WPC Class A SS power amp, (or) Arkless modded Leak Stereo 20, Modded Kef Reference 105/3's
    ReVox PR99, Studer B62, Ferrograph Series 7, Tandberg TCD440, Hitachi FT-5500MkI, also FT-5500MkII
    Digital: Yamaha CDR-HD1500 (Digital Swiss army knife-CD recorder, player, hard drive, DAC and ADC in one), PC files via 24/96 sound card and SPDIF, modded Philips CD850, modded Philips CD104, modded DPA Little Bit DAC. Sennheiser HD580 cans with Arkless Headphone amp.
    Cables- free interconnects that come with CD players, mains leads from B&Q, dead kettles etc, extension leads from Tesco

  9. #19
    Join Date: Nov 2008

    Location: North Down /Northern Ireland/ UK

    Posts: 19,484
    I'm Neil.

    Default

    Problem here is not all kit with XLR outs and ins is actually balanced. Balanced kit is dual differential. Using XLR outs may not sound better than RCA, but much depends on the circuit topology and the way the XLR outs and ins have been implemented.
    Regards Neil

  10. #20
    Join Date: Mar 2012

    Location: West Yorkshire

    Posts: 274
    I'm Bruce.

    Default

    What was said about Balanced circuit design issues in DAC's, preamps, and amps agrees with what I've heard before, and I take it on board. In fact, y preamp's Balanced input does use 3 more opamps than the Single Ended input... but the result still sounds better.

    No one has yet offered any guesses about why the XLR out of the DAC sounds better than its RCA out, even though the IC is a 1 meter RCA.
    20170423_151500.jpg
    Bruce

    Theories are not so much answers as questions, to be supported or undermined by experience & testing.

    Source: Audiolab 6000CDT > Calyx 24/192 DAC
    Amplification: Pass-design B1rev2 pre-amplifier > Neurochrome Modulus 686.
    Loudspeakers: Proac Response 1SC
    Cables/stands: spkr: MIT MH-750 biwire; IC: HT Truthlink; Target stands, sand-filled; Excel Cat6A 23AWG UFTP & 1attack.de Cat.7 SFTP.
    Other: Balanced AC transformer to hydra mains distr; Bass traps & Acoustic panels; Isolation: Inner tube & roller bearings; 3xZyxel ES104A switches in series w/Vreg upgrades.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •