+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 31 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 304

Thread: Describe differences in LP playback vs CD playback

  1. #11
    Join Date: Dec 2008

    Location: East Riding of Yorkshire these days

    Posts: 4,779
    I'm Shaun.

    Default

    I cannot say that one sounds better than the other, they both sound quite different to each other. I always have a preference for one over the other but that is totally dependent on my mood. They both sound stunning in the dark. Today I prefer vinyl but tomorrow I may not. To answer the question though, I don't care how they sound different I am just pleased that they do as it opens up even more possibilities.

  2. #12
    Join Date: Aug 2009

    Location: Staffordshire, England

    Posts: 37,883
    I'm Martin.

    Default

    Vinyl: Crunchy peanut butter

    CD: Smooth peanut butter

    This is the silliest cd vs vinyl thread yet. Are there more to come?
    Current Lash Up:

    TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > JM Labs Focal Electra 926.

  3. #13
    Bigman80 Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Macca View Post
    Vinyl: Crunchy peanut butter

    CD: Smooth peanut butter

    This is the silliest cd vs vinyl thread yet. Are there more to come?
    I like crunchy peanut butter the best. Lol

    Sent from my EVA-L09 using Tapatalk

  4. #14
    Join Date: Aug 2016

    Location: Manchester

    Posts: 122
    I'm Nick.

    Default

    CD: the wife
    LP: the mistress

  5. #15
    Join Date: Apr 2008

    Location: Cheshire, UK

    Posts: 2,829
    I'm Clive.

    Default

    CDs reach the head

    Records reach the heart
    TT 1 Trans-Fi Salvation with magnetic bearing + Trans-Fi Terminator T3Pro + London Reference
    TT 2 Garrard 301 with NWA main bearing + Audiomods Series Six 10.5" + Ortofon 2M Mono SE
    Digital Lindemann Bridge + Gustard R26 with LB external clock
    Pre and Power Amp EWA M40P + M40A
    Bass Amp & DSP Behringer iNuke NU3000DSP x 2
    Speakers 1 Bastanis Sagarmatha Duo with twin baffleless 15" bass drivers per side
    Speakers 2 MarkaudioSota Viotti Tower

  6. #16
    Join Date: Aug 2009

    Location: Staffordshire, England

    Posts: 37,883
    I'm Martin.

    Default

    Vinyl: Star Wars Episode Four: A New Hope

    CD: Star Wars Episode Five: The Empire Strikes Back

    Vinyl: Citroen 2cv

    CD: Renault 4

    Let's do British Leyland

    Vinyl: Morris Marina

    CD: Morris Ital
    Current Lash Up:

    TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > JM Labs Focal Electra 926.

  7. #17
    Join Date: Feb 2017

    Location: Sussex

    Posts: 324
    I'm Simon.

    Default

    Having a deck and vinyl is like being sentimental and buying an old classic car at quite a cost but possibly not having the tools and parts when they become obsolete (akin to a possible downturn in vinyl sales) with the opposite of cd (with downloads and streaming in conjunction) is like buying a better performing modern new car for less money and where you can get the parts and future ancillaries for it and where you know it won't become obsolete quickly.

    That's why I don't quite get the advantage of vinyl and record decks as being seen by some as crucial to enjoyment of audiophile music, particularly when there are only so many old releases of music you can get on vinyl and new ones too of course, but where primarily my choice around owning an album is for the sake of the music where CDs and downloads and streaming more than tick that box. In addition to all the convenience features and playlists of digital music.

    I appreciate this won't probably be popular but rather than spending money on a deck, cables, phono stage, I'd rather add that to other upgrades, be in the modern world, and listen to digital hugely available content.

  8. #18
    Join Date: Apr 2011

    Location: London

    Posts: 4,419
    I'm Robert.

    Default

    CD has made me go 'Wow! I like that'
    Vinyl has made my jaw drop and think this is just awesome!

  9. #19
    Join Date: Apr 2016

    Location: Gravesend and France

    Posts: 1,498
    I'm paul.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dynamics View Post
    Having a deck and vinyl is like being sentimental and buying an old classic car at quite a cost but possibly not having the tools and parts when they become obsolete (akin to a possible downturn in vinyl sales) with the opposite of cd (with downloads and streaming in conjunction) is like buying a better performing modern new car for less money and where you can get the parts and future ancillaries for it and where you know it won't become obsolete quickly.

    That's why I don't quite get the advantage of vinyl and record decks as being seen by some as crucial to enjoyment of audiophile music, particularly when there are only so many old releases of music you can get on vinyl and new ones too of course, but where primarily my choice around owning an album is for the sake of the music where CDs and downloads and streaming more than tick that box. In addition to all the convenience features and playlists of digital music.

    I appreciate this won't probably be popular but rather than spending money on a deck, cables, phono stage, I'd rather add that to other upgrades, be in the modern world, and listen to digital hugely available content.
    Streaming and downloads have no soul. Other upgrades? Like cables?
    Bakoon 13r Denon DP80 Stax UA-70 Shure Ultra 500 in a Martin Bastin body with jico stylus, project ds2 digital Rullit aero 8 field coils in tqwt speakers

    Office system, DIY CSS fullrange speakers with aurum cantus G2 ribbons yulong dac Sony STR6055 receiver Jvc QL-A51 direct drive turntable, Leema sub. JVC Z4S cart is in the house

    Garage system another Sony receiver, cassette deck


    System components are subject to change without warning and at the discretion of the owner.

  10. #20
    Join Date: May 2010

    Location: Vancouver, Canada

    Posts: 2,166
    I'm Alex.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dynamics View Post
    Having a deck and vinyl is like being sentimental and buying an old classic car at quite a cost but possibly not having the tools and parts when they become obsolete (akin to a possible downturn in vinyl sales) with the opposite of cd (with downloads and streaming in conjunction) is like buying a better performing modern new car for less money and where you can get the parts and future ancillaries for it and where you know it won't become obsolete quickly.

    That's why I don't quite get the advantage of vinyl and record decks as being seen by some as crucial to enjoyment of audiophile music, particularly when there are only so many old releases of music you can get on vinyl and new ones too of course, but where primarily my choice around owning an album is for the sake of the music where CDs and downloads and streaming more than tick that box. In addition to all the convenience features and playlists of digital music.

    I appreciate this won't probably be popular but rather than spending money on a deck, cables, phono stage, I'd rather add that to other upgrades, be in the modern world, and listen to digital hugely available content.
    My problem with CDs (and other digital artefacts) is that they are being marketed/sold to the populace as the final frontier. Sort of like 'finally, now we all have access to the entire content, to our entire cultural heritage! It's just a two, maximum three google clicks away."

    Well, I'm calling baloney on that. The way I see it, digitized content is merely a tip of the iceberg. There is an enormous body of content invisible to google. This content has never been digitized (nor will it ever be). The only time publishing houses choose to digitize some heritage content is if the digitization/packaging/marketing and distribution can be proven to be commercially viable.

    That leaves a huge bottom of the pyramid in the digital darkness.

    I go to my local record stores and I find tons of amazing LPs that are virtually unobtainable on google. They will never become obtainable for the above mentioned reasons.

    Furthermore, even the ones that are obtainable, have been mostly extremely poorly digitized. To the point of 'why bother?' Incompetent people have proven to be phenomenally good at delivering botched CDs, hi rez formats, etc. Just because it's a no brainer to push a button and transfer analog signal to digital, doesn't mean the job is done and you can now go home. But that's how they treat it, and are allowed to get away with murder.

    That's why I made a comeback to LPs -- realized that most of the precious, fulfilling content still remains buried in the pile of old used LPs.
    Don't you just hate it when you cannot detect where the post ends and a signature line begins?

    Alex.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 31 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •