Jerry- Your point is well made and well taken. I don't know if there is a universal way of tuning the output of a speaker. Could be measured at one meter or three meters and it may not be the same for all designs, dunno. Some of the comments I receive do report a change in high frequency response. Response is not the right word, actually. High frequency response perception is more accurate. Less noise, more information about sums it up. And it's what that does that has earned respect for my not so little product. Many of their reports are online at the places I've talked about. Sources can be seen on the Blank Canvas thread.
In my avatar at the moment is a frequency measurement made by a speaker designer in the US named Danny Richie. I'm the blue line. He picked the speakers, not me. I also have one from a tweaker down under using DEQX on Dynaudio Special 25's. Same story. And one appears in an online review magazine named Stereomojo. Same thing, again. As you can see, there is no curtailment to the high end frequency measurement. There is, however, a smoothing of peaks and valleys around the crossover and a bit beyond. Might this be relevant?
I'm thinking that maybe Mr. Andrew's product may encroach too closely to the tweeter itself. I use a high grade of compressed wool myself for the quality of absorbency it yields. Some felt products are filled with synthetic fiber which would cut down the absorbency. That could be relevant. And, I sell with a guarantee so people are able to audition at home.
Cheers
Last edited by jimdgoulding; 21-03-2008 at 23:59.
Hear your music, not your speakers
Reply With Quote
I'm a sucker for a challenge, too. I'll send you a PM to discuss those nitty gritty little personal details in a minute.
Originally Posted by jimdgoulding
