+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: Calculating mass/resonance figures for Zu Denon 103

  1. #1
    Join Date: Mar 2014

    Location: KY - Scotland

    Posts: 5,470
    I'm Mike.

    Default Calculating mass/resonance figures for Zu Denon 103

    I've just received my Zu back from repair at Zu in Utah and was setting it up again and thought I'd try and get it right this time by using a calculator to work out the correct mass that the cartridge should have in relation to my Mission 774 arm.

    Standard figures are:

    Cartridge weight 14g
    Arm effective mass 5.5g
    Cartridge Compliance is 5 cu (5 x 10 –6 cm / dyne)

    Now I've bodged up extra weight on the cartridge AND the counterweight and it sounds pretty good, so it must be right, right

    I used a figure I worked out using a formula I found on the net, but I'm wondering if someone can tell me what THEY think the weight of the cartridge should be to get the figure to fall within the 8-12hz range that's supposed to be ideal.

    I'll then know if my calculation is correct lol.

    I'm not telling you what I have it at in case I'm found to be a complete numpty

    PS: Photos to follow once I'm proven wrong lol

  2. #2
    Join Date: Sep 2014

    Location: brighton uk.

    Posts: 4,737
    I'm jamie.

    Default

    a lot i would have thought!
    have you looked here?
    http://www.vinylengine.com/cartridge...&submit=Submit
    My System
    John Wood KT88 Amp.
    Paradise Phono Stage
    Sony TTS-8000 Turntable.
    PMAT-1010 MK6 Tonearm.
    Ortofon Cadenza Bronze
    Sony X555ES Cd Player
    Yamaha NS1000m Speakers

  3. #3
    Join Date: Mar 2014

    Location: KY - Scotland

    Posts: 5,470
    I'm Mike.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jamie123 View Post
    a lot i would have thought!
    have you looked here?
    http://www.vinylengine.com/cartridge...&submit=Submit
    Lol funnily enough I have it set at a 'lot' just now, I weighed it and just wondered if I'd calculated correctly.

    I tried looking at the vinylengine version but it just confused me, ( actually that's not true, it's the Denon compliance figures that confuses me with the 10hz 100hz thing ) I found a formula to try and that's what I used.

    Although I think I still need to add a few grams yet to be 100%

  4. #4
    Join Date: Sep 2014

    Location: brighton uk.

    Posts: 4,737
    I'm jamie.

    Default

    lol thats why i posted the same thread a while back for my cartridge,all that dyne bollocks goes right over my head!
    my thread is here, http://theartofsound.net/forum/showt...ance-frequency

    if you have no luck shoot the members who helped me a pm
    My System
    John Wood KT88 Amp.
    Paradise Phono Stage
    Sony TTS-8000 Turntable.
    PMAT-1010 MK6 Tonearm.
    Ortofon Cadenza Bronze
    Sony X555ES Cd Player
    Yamaha NS1000m Speakers

  5. #5
    Join Date: Mar 2015

    Location: Finland

    Posts: 237
    I'm Kai.

    Default

    I have no idea what the actual compliance @*10Hz is for the DL-103 and I've never owned one, but my guess is it'll be somewhere around 10, say 8-12. Assuming that, the minimum would probably be around 15-20g (tonearm/headshell + cartridge combined) and you could go as high as 40g or even more, depending what the compliance actually is.

    Some cartridges / combos might prefer the res. freq on the low (or high) side for best sound quality, and perhaps the DL-103 is one of those judging from all the comments it needs some mass to shine.

  6. #6
    Join Date: Mar 2014

    Location: KY - Scotland

    Posts: 5,470
    I'm Mike.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by helma View Post
    I have no idea what the actual compliance @*10Hz is for the DL-103 and I've never owned one, but my guess is it'll be somewhere around 10, say 8-12. Assuming that, the minimum would probably be around 15-20g (tonearm/headshell + cartridge combined) and you could go as high as 40g or even more, depending what the compliance actually is.

    Some cartridges / combos might prefer the res. freq on the low (or high) side for best sound quality, and perhaps the DL-103 is one of those judging from all the comments it needs some mass to shine.
    I think I read somewhere that you multiply the 5 by 1.8 which gives 9 so that might be right enough.

  7. #7
    Join Date: Jul 2011

    Location: Northamptonshire

    Posts: 1,916
    I'm Peter.

    Default

    Ask Barry

    .... which could become my standard response to a lot of questions on this forum

  8. #8
    Join Date: Mar 2014

    Location: KY - Scotland

    Posts: 5,470
    I'm Mike.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by petrat View Post
    Ask Barry

    .... which could become my standard response to a lot of questions on this forum
    Could make it a Stickie lol

    "Ask Barry"


  9. #9
    Join Date: Jan 2016

    Location: Shenfield

    Posts: 574
    I'm Slav.

    Default

    Assuming 9cu is correct to fall within 8-12Hz total weight of arm, headshell and cartridge is in range 19.5-44 gram , so there is massive room to play with .
    103 loves high mass arms I would try to be well above 30g.

  10. #10
    Join Date: Mar 2014

    Location: KY - Scotland

    Posts: 5,470
    I'm Mike.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mac72 View Post
    Assuming 9cu is correct to fall within 8-12Hz total weight of arm, headshell and cartridge is in range 19.5-44 gram , so there is massive room to play with .
    103 loves high mass arms I would try to be well above 30g.
    mmmmmmm interesting 😉

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •