+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: Irrational urge to bi-wire

  1. #21
    Join Date: Feb 2008

    Location: South Wales

    Posts: 9,151
    I'm NotTakingLifeTooSeriouslyTheseDays.

    Default

    Tend to agree!
    I have experimented with Bi-wiring over the years, and although i found it did make a diffrence, i came to the conclusion that it was mainly negative.
    Especialy if you use a diffrent type of cable for each driver...
    Quote Originally Posted by Arkless Electronics View Post
    Thickest cable of shortest length means lowest resistance and hence maximum damping factor and least effect on frequency response due to interaction with crossover.
    "Today scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality"
    Nikola Tesla



    Its now a conspiracy theory to believe that the Immune system is capable of doing the job it was designed to do.
    A fish is only as healthy as the water its swimming in ! [Dr Robert Young]


    www.tubedistinctions.co.uk

    Matthew 5:10

  2. #22
    Join Date: Oct 2012

    Location: NE England

    Posts: 4,173
    I'm Jez.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anthonyTD View Post
    Tend to agree!
    I have experimented with Bi-wiring over the years, and although i found it did make a diffrence, i came to the conclusion that it was mainly negative.
    Especialy if you use a diffrent type of cable for each driver...
    Ah well of course if you use a thinnish cable for one and a thick for the other small resistive differences between them will interact with the crossover etc to give a slightly skew whiff FR....
    Arkless Electronics-Engineered to be better. Tel. 01670 530674 (after 1pm)

    Modded Thorens TD150, Audio Technica AT-1005 MkII, Technics EPC-300MC, Arkless Hybrid MC phono stage, Arkless passive pre, Arkless 50WPC Class A SS power amp, (or) Arkless modded Leak Stereo 20, Modded Kef Reference 105/3's
    ReVox PR99, Studer B62, Ferrograph Series 7, Tandberg TCD440, Hitachi FT-5500MkI, also FT-5500MkII
    Digital: Yamaha CDR-HD1500 (Digital Swiss army knife-CD recorder, player, hard drive, DAC and ADC in one), PC files via 24/96 sound card and SPDIF, modded Philips CD850, modded Philips CD104, modded DPA Little Bit DAC. Sennheiser HD580 cans with Arkless Headphone amp.
    Cables- free interconnects that come with CD players, mains leads from B&Q, dead kettles etc, extension leads from Tesco

  3. #23
    Join Date: Feb 2008

    Location: South Wales

    Posts: 9,151
    I'm NotTakingLifeTooSeriouslyTheseDays.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arkless Electronics View Post
    Ah well of course if you use a thinnish cable for one and a thick for the other small resistive differences between them will interact with the crossover etc to give a slightly skew whiff FR....
    "Today scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality"
    Nikola Tesla



    Its now a conspiracy theory to believe that the Immune system is capable of doing the job it was designed to do.
    A fish is only as healthy as the water its swimming in ! [Dr Robert Young]


    www.tubedistinctions.co.uk

    Matthew 5:10

  4. #24
    Join Date: Nov 2008

    Location: North Down /Northern Ireland/ UK

    Posts: 19,484
    I'm Neil.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hifi_dave View Post
    The only benefit with bi-wiring is the removal of the cacky brass connectors usually used between the terminals. Replace those with a decent piece of wire and you've done the job for a fraction of the cost.
    + 1
    Regards Neil

  5. #25
    Join Date: Dec 2008

    Location: East Riding of Yorkshire these days

    Posts: 4,779
    I'm Shaun.

    Default

    I have tried bi-wiring my KEF Q500's and the sound was different but I would hesitate to say it was better. It was definitely different though.

  6. #26
    danilo Guest

    Default

    Hmmm in mid 90's Having just bought a Pair of Arcam D290's ( Inty and Power units) I immediately tried the double run of Wire.
    Hey! the sales man said; "s good!"
    It made No differences that I could hear. Did make more of a wire mess that the Housemate complained about though.
    Truth was the Arcams subsequently proved themselves to be poorly designed underperfoming amps.... Grrrr.
    So in retrospect the Biwiring itself may not have been at fault.
    No plans on repeating the experiment though.

  7. #27
    Join Date: Jan 2013

    Location: Bristol

    Posts: 6,843
    I'm Justin.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anthonyTD View Post
    Tend to agree!
    I have experimented with Bi-wiring over the years, and although i found it did make a diffrence, i came to the conclusion that it was mainly negative.
    Especialy if you use a diffrent type of cable for each driver...
    I found solid core on the ESL and multi-strand on the bass driver of Martin Logan Ascents to work well. Worth trying stuff like that if you already have the cables.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •