+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: cartridge resonance frequency

  1. #1
    Join Date: Sep 2014

    Location: brighton uk.

    Posts: 4,737
    I'm jamie.

    Default cartridge resonance frequency

    would some kind soul work out for me mine please.
    my arm is an alphason hr100mcs at an effective mass of 11g
    my cartridge is an ortofon mc-25fl at 10.5g
    the calculators are over my head
    My System
    John Wood KT88 Amp.
    Paradise Phono Stage
    Sony TTS-8000 Turntable.
    PMAT-1010 MK6 Tonearm.
    Ortofon Cadenza Bronze
    Sony X555ES Cd Player
    Yamaha NS1000m Speakers

  2. #2
    Join Date: Jul 2010

    Location: Cheltenham

    Posts: 982
    I'm Charlie.

    Default

    http://www.vinylengine.com/cartridge..._evaluator.php

    Its 8 Hz - perfect
    11 g tonearm mass
    10.5 g cartridge mass plus 1 g for fixings
    Compliance 16 according to vinyl engine database

  3. #3
    Join Date: Sep 2014

    Location: brighton uk.

    Posts: 4,737
    I'm jamie.

    Default

    thanks dude much appreciated,i have a heaver counter weight for the arm,i take it there's no point trying it now.
    My System
    John Wood KT88 Amp.
    Paradise Phono Stage
    Sony TTS-8000 Turntable.
    PMAT-1010 MK6 Tonearm.
    Ortofon Cadenza Bronze
    Sony X555ES Cd Player
    Yamaha NS1000m Speakers

  4. #4
    montesquieu Guest

    Default

    Medium-mass arm, medium-compliance cartridge, it will be fine I wouldn't bother about the exact numbers, they may tell you the resonance but it won't tell you much really about the sound.

    With the extra weight you can run really heavy cartridges that are lower compliance, and balance things out. But as you say you won't need that here.

  5. #5
    Join Date: Jun 2012

    Location: glasgow

    Posts: 1,508
    I'm scott.

    Default

    Test Record always handy to check Tonearm Resonance

  6. #6
    montesquieu Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by daytona600 View Post
    Test Record always handy to check Tonearm Resonance
    Once you've bought both arm and cartridge, yes ... calculator/rules of thumb are helpful before spending the £££ though ....

  7. #7
    danilo Guest

    Default

    Isolation mounting of a Cart really did help (do away?) with Arm resonance concerns for me.
    I've used Foam tape in lieu of screws and despite it seeming daft...It works a treat.. seriously.
    One could also source specialised Foam tapes that are used to isolate precision solid state Gyros... for the ultimate in isolation.
    I'm tending to thoughts that Screws/bolts may not be the best possible way to mount a cart :-)

  8. #8
    montesquieu Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by danilo View Post
    Isolation mounting of a Cart really did help (do away?) with Arm resonance concerns for me.
    I've used Foam tape in lieu of screws and despite it seeming daft...It works a treat.. seriously.
    One could also source specialised Foam tapes that are used to isolate precision solid state Gyros... for the ultimate in isolation.
    I'm tending to thoughts that Screws/bolts may not be the best possible way to mount a cart :-)
    Hmm I got a Cartridgeman Isolator with a Catridgeman moving magmet cartridge once, s/h as part of the package. I wasn't convinced by it at all. My sense is that it may be a useful tweak on a cheapo tonearm/cartridge combo, but after forking out for decent kit I'd rather let the components do their job as their designers intended.

    My general view is that messrs Sugano, Ikeda, Carr, and successive designers at the likes of Ortofon, Clearaudio etc, to say nothing of homegrown talent like our own J7 at Audio Origami, probably knew what they were doing and if top performance was as simple as a bit of foam tape then we'd all be using it.

    But then again there's a market for cable lifters and Shakti stones so there you go ....

  9. #9
    Join Date: Jan 2009

    Location: Essex

    Posts: 32,301
    I'm openingabottleofwine.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by montesquieu View Post
    Hmm I got a Cartridgeman Isolator with a Catridgeman moving magmet cartridge once, s/h as part of the package. I wasn't convinced by it at all. My sense is that it may be a useful tweak on a cheapo tonearm/cartridge combo, but after forking out for decent kit I'd rather let the components do their job as their designers intended.

    My general view is that messrs Sugano, Ikeda, Carr, and successive designers at the likes of Ortofon, Clearaudio etc, to say nothing of homegrown talent like our own J7 at Audio Origami, probably knew what they were doing and if top performance was as simple as a bit of foam tape then we'd all be using it.

    But then again there's a market for cable lifters and Shakti stones so there you go ....
    I agree - it does seem to fly in the face of accepted wisdom that there should be as tight and rigid connection between the cartridge body and arm as possible (though not as tight as some 'Flat Earthers' would have you make it!).

    The only cartridge in my experience which can benefit from some decoupling is the Decca; but then Deccas are a law unto themselves.
    Barry

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •