Absolutely..
I've been asked to compose an article regarding my observations and past perspectives on LP cutting and CD mastering and I shall when I have time. Analogue era master tapes for LP cutting were often eq'd toppy and thin and often edits were rough in the knowledge that the LP as pressed and played on granny's old BSR groove-grinder would mask these flaws. Transcribe "flat" to digital and these flaws are magnified if anything, or at least, starkly shown up.
Good mastering engineers given free reign can make wonderful silk-like purses from these old tapes and if the artist is involved as well, then often wondrous things can be accomplished. All too often, economies of scale take over, together with sucked-out B&W 801's used as monitors, in Europe at any rate..
I have a suspicion that the pressing plants may be partly to blame for icky sounding CD's, but it seems to me that sorted CD players of old and a good few modern ones seem to be able to handle "difficult or jittery" CD's better...
The only thing "wrong" with red-book digital is the audible effects of the post 20KHz filtering, although other concerns of truncated bits lower in level is perhaps misleading when the 16 bit system supposedly gives us 96db s/n and our ears work on a 50db range on a sliding scale. Most "analogue" tape his is around minus 70 to 80 db I reckon and vinyl roar is minus 40db in the midrange at best, although substantially better at high frequencies.
So much to chat about over several pints
P.S. The jitter spectrum of CDR's, certainly in the early days of CD burning, appeared to be "smoother" in terms of "sidebands" as I remember and this helped the DAC to switch on-and-off more precicely (or summat). Often, CDR's made a slower speeds from CD originals could sometimes sound "better"