+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: TVs between speakers, flat v curved?

  1. #1
    Join Date: Nov 2010

    Location: Coventry

    Posts: 2,839
    I'm Will.

    Default TVs between speakers, flat v curved?

    I'm considering a new TV, a recent speaker upgrade has left my 42" plasma looking a little diminutive...please refer to attached image

    I've heard it mentioned that it's not the best practice to have a TV between ones speakers, however it's pretty damned essential from an AV point of view

    One option these days is a curved TV panel, would a curved TV screen be less detrimental to SQ?


    20160102_103149.jpg


    Doh! Hi Grant can you please move this to the 'AV Displays' thread...my bad!
    Last edited by WAD62; 25-01-2016 at 15:45.
    Cheers, Will

  2. #2
    Join Date: Apr 2008

    Location: Warrington

    Posts: 2,159
    I'm Neil.

    Default

    Curved screens look great. No idea about impact on SQ!
    Mana Acoustics Racks >> Custom Silent Media Server >> Halide Bridge USB (with AQVOX USB power) >> Pedja Rogic's Audial Model S DAC + Pioneer PL-71 turntable / Vista Audio phono-1 mk II / Denon PCL-5 headshell / Reson Reca >> LFD DLS >> LFD PA2M (SE) >> Royd RR3s.

  3. #3
    Join Date: Nov 2008

    Location: Belfast/Northern Ireland/UK

    Posts: 14,922
    I'm Neil.

    Default

    More an issue with CRT TVs as they were huge. As long as the TV is behind the front axis of the speakers there should be no issues.
    Regards Neil

  4. #4
    Join Date: Nov 2010

    Location: Coventry

    Posts: 2,839
    I'm Will.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dalek Supreme D L View Post
    More an issue with CRT TVs as they were huge. As long as the TV is behind the front axis of the speakers there should be no issues.
    After a bit of trawling the web looks like the consensus of opinion matches yours Neil, if the curve were convex as opposed to concave it might help, but would be rubbish to watch, I'd imagine... unless after a recreational cigarette or two

    I'd rather go for flat, but wondered if there'd be any acoustic benefit with a curved one...my screen will be about 6 inches behind the back of the speakers so should be fine...
    Cheers, Will

  5. #5
    Join Date: Nov 2008

    Location: Belfast/Northern Ireland/UK

    Posts: 14,922
    I'm Neil.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WAD62 View Post
    After a bit of trawling the web looks like the consensus of opinion matches yours Neil, if the curve were convex as opposed to concave it might help, but would be rubbish to watch, I'd imagine... unless after a recreational cigarette or two

    I'd rather go for flat, but wondered if there'd be any acoustic benefit with a curved one...my screen will be about 6 inches behind the back of the speakers so should be fine...
    I think flat is probably better than curved, because the ends of the curve stick up, but I can't say this is defo an issue because my TV is flat, and have no experience of a curved set. The back of my speakers are level with the front of the screen.
    Regards Neil

  6. #6
    Join Date: Oct 2014

    Location: Lincolnshire

    Posts: 278
    I'm Graham.

    Default

    Can't comment on flat or curved except the curved screens are very expensive my telly is between and just behind and above all speakers. It may be worth considering a new tv stand that raises your tv......loads on ebay and not bad prices see mine

    "An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" Ernest Hemingway

    Set-Up (So Far) Garrard 401 with Rega 300 arm & Black 2M, Longdog Audio twin valve dual input phono, Denon DVD 2500 Transport all through Creek Destiny Mk1 integrated amp into Rega RS3 Floor standers

  7. #7
    Join Date: Nov 2010

    Location: Coventry

    Posts: 2,839
    I'm Will.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom-Brown View Post
    Can't comment on flat or curved except the curved screens are very expensive my telly is between and just behind and above all speakers. It may be worth considering a new tv stand that raises your tv......loads on ebay and not bad prices see mine
    I'm thinking about a 65"er, which would either mean keeping it low or living in the dark...

    Hence my concern as 65" would neatly fit the gap between the speakers, at the same height, albeit 6" behind them, but there'd only be 3 to 4" between the speaker and TV edges in that event...
    Cheers, Will

  8. #8
    Join Date: Oct 2008

    Location: Glasgowshire

    Posts: 5,943
    I'm availableforweddingsAndBarmitzvas.

    Default

    Shouldn't matter Will, as Neil says as long as its behid the front plane of the speakers your good to go.
    No problems with my 60" between my speakers, though ideally I'd have liked it mounted lower on the wall.

    The system rack between my speakers (another argument entirely...) meant the telly had to go higher up.
    Sent from my ZX81 using Sinclair Basic

  9. #9
    Join Date: Nov 2010

    Location: Coventry

    Posts: 2,839
    I'm Will.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gazjam View Post
    Shouldn't matter Will, as Neil says as long as its behid the front plane of the speakers your good to go.
    No problems with my 60" between my speakers, though ideally I'd have liked it mounted lower on the wall.

    The system rack between my speakers (another argument entirely...) meant the telly had to go higher up.
    Just spotted your reply Gaz, in the end I went with a flat 55" panasonic CX802, last years flagship at less than half price!

    On reflection 65" would have been too much...
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Cheers, Will

  10. #10
    Join Date: Oct 2008

    Location: Glasgowshire

    Posts: 5,943
    I'm availableforweddingsAndBarmitzvas.

    Default

    Sweet.
    Looks great Will.
    Sent from my ZX81 using Sinclair Basic

+ Reply to Thread



 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •