Soundhaspriority wrote:
'Thanks for saying so. Because it seems as though I'm not as bothered by that as I was by seeing other administrators criticizing me but not saying a word to anyone else, including Steve (Aquapiranha) who is currently pursuing a campaign of personal attacks on my character he initiated since my first post. In fact, fully no members have a problem with anything that ie. AP or Greg has said to or about me (ie. I must be a drug dealer), for they haven't denounced that, but are not shy about telling me they don't like my 'tude. Attacks, I can take. Hypocrisy and injustice, I have a harder time tolerating.
I don't much like being accused of being a "shill" either. Because where does it end? Can I just stupidly accuse someone of being a wife beater, if their name reminds me of a wife beater's name? Is that okay? "It is my personal opinion you might be" is perhaps a little more tolerable. But then I would argue that you should keep those opinions to yourself, because they only serve to escalate flame wars. Personal accusations are neither respectful nor civil. If I come across as a paid shill, that's really not my fault, and nor should it be my problem. It is the baseless presumption of those making it. To me, it's a means of oppressing thoughts and ideas you don't agree with. Some have been less subtle in their efforts to oppress my thoughts and ideas, by telling me to "shut up and go away" and calling for my banishment.'
But I did not attack you from your first post, if you bothered to read anything I have posted, you would have seen that this is not the first time I have come across you on the web. A couple of years ago, someone on another forum, pinkfish, mentioned belt. You were on the case instantly, just as you were here like you have some kind of belt radar. It was not long before everyone saw through you however and you are now banned from that forum. but, that is not the only forum at which you are not welcome is it? a quick google reveals you have been a very busy boy, attempting to spread your outlandish practices throughout the globe!
Now, I really do not care if you do not respond any more, I have much better and more pressing things to be getting on with than to cross swords with a wordy 'guru' such as you. It seems you have more fun on the pro-audio sites, I imagine they are an even harder sell than some of us on here (and yes, the use of the word sell was quite deliberate).
Now, in the interests of balance, everyone should be allowed to have their say, but when what is said is merely a marketing mandate, well then I think that person should be registered as trade, and not a private poster.
Oh my, this is maybe the longest post I have made here, preferring as I do to keep brief and to the point usually, unlike yourself.
Last edited by aquapiranha; 15-10-2009 at 21:07.
They swim... the mark of Satan is upon them. They must hang.
FLAC / WDTV Live / Cambridge Audio / Tannoy VX12
Originally Posted by anthonyTD
I said the details were important, because I don't want people skipping out on important stuff simply because they can't imagine how it might be, then screaming at me and saying I wasted 5 minutes of their precious precious time after it doesn't pan out. The listening room is whatever room you listen in, so no, it shouldn't matter really if the gear is not in it, even if its likely preferable that it is.
