Dire Straits 'Brothers In Arms' was a 1985 recording that was famously (mostly) digital and digital recording was already possible well before that date so I am sceptical that it took a full 10 years after that before it became the norm, certainly for any major label recordings, although I am willing to be educated on that.
Digital cutting lathes were commonplace by 1980 so any vinyl produced after that date will have been run through an ADC even if it was an analogue recording. This will also apply to any re-issues of older stuff too.
That fact alone should indicate that it is pretty pointless worrying too much about it. In addition whether it was 'mastered for CD' or not is fairly irrelevant to the sound quality.
The main factors for me would be 1) How well the actual recording process was done I.e how expertly things were miked up, how much attention to detail was paid, number of takes, overall ability of the musicians and the engineer, the quality of the mics, the desk and the studio environment itself.
2)How it was recorded: analogue tape, digital or a mixture of the two. Personally I think a good digital recording easily tops analogue for clarity and realism but I accept that is subjective.
3) How well it was mixed
4) How well it was mastered - too much overall compression added so that it can be listened to in noisy environments or on crap equipment, or minimal compression for good dynamic range.
After all that which format it goes onto for replay is a pretty minor thing and providing the vinyl pressing has been done competently (which seems rare nowadays) I really don't think it makes any significant difference given a replay system that is equally competent with both vinyl and digital.
Current Lash Up:
TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > JM Labs Focal Electra 926.