+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Can I borrow an expensive interconnect - pretty please!

  1. #11
    Join Date: Apr 2008

    Location: Warrington

    Posts: 3,451
    I'm Neil.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rothchild View Post
    I'm somewhat bewildered by this, how can cable make 'night and day' differences and command ridiculous prices in an unbalanced format but 'not have a sound' if presented in a balanced format? (especially over the short distances we're talking about in terms of interconnects)

    If this was actually the case why would hi end hi-fi manufacturers not take the opportunity to remove this variable from the quality of their gear and just make it all use balanced connectors?

    Sorry op, I don't have a cable to lend you, but I am intrigued to see how this pans out.
    Read Strat's post above yours for one technical reason.

    Also the most cable and materials fanatic manufacturer I know (LFD) doesn't even make XLR cables anymore.
    Mana Acoustics Racks / Bright Star IsoNodes Decoupling >> Allo DigiOne Player >> Pedja Rogic's Audial Model S DAC + Pioneer PL-71 turntable / Vista Audio phono-1 mk II / Denon PCL-5 headshell / Reson Reca >> LFD DLS >> LFD PA2M (SE) >> Royd RR3s.

  2. #12
    Join Date: Apr 2008

    Location: Warrington

    Posts: 3,451
    I'm Neil.

    Default

    Really though, cables only make a night and day difference if they are broken or have weird, extreme, LCR parameters.
    Mana Acoustics Racks / Bright Star IsoNodes Decoupling >> Allo DigiOne Player >> Pedja Rogic's Audial Model S DAC + Pioneer PL-71 turntable / Vista Audio phono-1 mk II / Denon PCL-5 headshell / Reson Reca >> LFD DLS >> LFD PA2M (SE) >> Royd RR3s.

  3. #13
    Join Date: Aug 2009

    Location: Staffordshire, England

    Posts: 37,964
    I'm Martin.

    Default

    Night and day is one thing but I think most of us have heard interconnects sound subtly different. And if that subtle difference is also a subtle improvement then it would appear that the change/cost was worth doing. Subtle improvements are just as worth having as night and day improvements.

    XLR cables are analogue the same as RCA cables so why should they not have different, albeit subtle, effects on the sound the same as RCA cables?

    If anyone is one of those folk who think all cables with LCR within the acceptable range sound identical then come round here and I will demonstrate to your satisfaction that you are mistaken
    Current Lash Up:

    TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > JM Labs Focal Electra 926.

  4. #14
    Join Date: Apr 2008

    Location: Warrington

    Posts: 3,451
    I'm Neil.

    Default

    A lot of it is down to RCA being a flawed connection in many ways allowing more variances to exist.
    Mana Acoustics Racks / Bright Star IsoNodes Decoupling >> Allo DigiOne Player >> Pedja Rogic's Audial Model S DAC + Pioneer PL-71 turntable / Vista Audio phono-1 mk II / Denon PCL-5 headshell / Reson Reca >> LFD DLS >> LFD PA2M (SE) >> Royd RR3s.

  5. #15
    Join Date: Aug 2009

    Location: Staffordshire, England

    Posts: 37,964
    I'm Martin.

    Default

    Fair point.
    Current Lash Up:

    TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > JM Labs Focal Electra 926.

  6. #16
    Join Date: Nov 2008

    Location: Valley of the Hazels

    Posts: 9,139
    I'm AMusicFanNotAnAudiophile.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Macca View Post
    XLR cables are analogue the same as RCA cables so why should they not have different, albeit subtle, effects on the sound the same as RCA cables?
    XLR source equipment generally has higher output than single ended ended (typically twice that of CD), so you might well find that the combination of higher drive and differential signalling might well make any differences a lot less apparent.

    You'll also find that impedance matching is between components will be properly implemented - Pro users do not like flakey, and kit that utilises pro connections will be built to pro specs.
    Proper impedance matching is taken as a given.
    If it isn't then word gets around very quickly, to the detriment of the non complying company's sales.
    Chris



    Common sense isn't anymore!

  7. #17
    Join Date: Apr 2014

    Location: Chorley, Lancashire

    Posts: 260
    I'm Steven.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andrei View Post
    Good idea Steven - well worth a try! See if you can give Oyaide AZ-910 or AR-910 a go from somewhere.
    By the way, how do you find your Ayon CD player compared with the others. I'm curious 'cause I just got first bit of Ayon gear?
    Hi Andrei

    The Ayon CD-3S is the best front end I have ever heard. It's as simple as that. To my ears it shows just how far CD players have come - just in time for everyone to move to PC/internet based audio!!

    Here's what Hifi+ (September 2013) make of the Ayon CD-3S:
    "This is instead one of the best sounding CD players you can buy. In fact, it’s so good, it makes you question the need to rip all those discs to a computer, when they sound this good. In 2013, audiophile CD replay needs a champion to fight for the cause. In the Ayon Audio CD-3s, I think we’ve found it."

    The full article can be read here: http://www.fiaudio.co.uk/news/ayon-a...fi-review.html

    I'm always a bit wary of gushing product reviews but on this occasion I agree with the reviewer. My ears back up his judgements. Perhaps our ears are wired up the same!

    Ayon certainly seem to have tried hard with the 3S. The build quality is amazing for a start - panel fit, polished alloy, slab sized casings, perfect paint, crisp CNC machining, etc. are all as good as anything out there. Inside there are gold plated circuit boards, 4 transformers, high end DAC chips, expensive capacitors, a hefty transport mechanism (using an easy to find Sony laser from their ubiquitous KSS series) made by another Austrian firm Stream Unlimited, neat wiring, etc. and, shock horror(!), 8 valves...We don't see many valve based CD players these days which, if the 3S is anything to go by, is a real shame.

    Being a valve based CD player may give the impression that this is a machine oozing an 'analogue like' smooth sound (whatever that really is...). A sort of big cuddly soft thing perfect for warm and cozy listening sessions long into the night. Well, there is no evidence of such behaviour. The sound is entirely neutral. I suspect that 'all' you get is what has been recorded. Nothing added or taken away. So, great Steely Dan recordings for instance sound just amazing. The superb dynamic range of their recordings really give my amp a good workout - it's fun watching the VU meters going ballistic at only modest listening levels! A dense aggressive recording like Nirvana's 'Nevermind' (loudness war kings!) comes across full of rage, distortion, etc. A real mess of a recording if ever there was one but nevertheless revealed in all its brutal glory. You sit in the chair with your senses being assaulted by all that dense hard edged energy and can't help but reflect on the fact that it is being generated by warm and cuddly valves! Surely a sign of valves being within a well designed system that allows them to major on accuracy rather than colouration?

    The mythical hard edged CD 'grain' is totally absent. Detail retrieval is phenomenal. Absolutely phenomenal. Until I got this player I had no idea just how much information is actually on a CD. With my Beyerdynamic T1 Headphones I can go so far into the mix that all sorts of incidental background stuff appears - guitar amp buzz, tiny amounts of feedback, vocal phrasing, etc. are all there and I had never heard them before. All the other stuff we enjoy, e.g. vast soundstage, bass extension, timing, space, tonality, etc, etc. are all there in spades too.

    It's not all perfect though. I suppose a forensic level of detail retrieval and absolute neutrality are always going to reveal poor recordings as, well, poor. That's okay for me; frustrating, but a fact of life.

    Function wise there's plenty to mess about with: built in pre-amp , PC/internet connections, inputs for other transports, etc. As I have no interest in PC audio (much of my working day is taken up by endless PC problems which I am in no rush to 'enjoy' at home...) I have no idea how the 3S deals with PC audio and high res files. The 3S does make a superb DAC though for other CD players. I run a mint £25 Technics SLPG-590 CD Player into it and the sound quality is fantastic!!! Easily the qual of a £2k turntable and £2k phonostage. My Denon CD player gets a significant boost in sound quality too. Still, that's modern high end DACs for you. They really are superb and mean that my 3S will live on long after its transport has died or become extinct! This seems unlikely though as Sony KSS lasers are everywhere. Also Ayon have a policy of providing service parts for a long time - they are keen to avoid their CD players being written off prematurely by worn out lasers. Other high end manufacturers take note. We know who you are.

    If the 3S stays in one piece then I will be ecstatic! Let's hope I have more luck with it than with some of my previous CD players.

    Here's a few naked piccies:





















    Hats off to Ayon then. A hifi manufacturer very much in the zone just now.

    Regards

    Steve
    "Jingoism, racism, fear, religious fundamentalism: these are the ways of appealing to people if you're trying to organize a mass base of support for policies that are really intended to crush them".
    Noam Chomsky

    Current set up:
    Benchmark LA4 pre-amplifier and AHB2 power amplifier
    Sony CDP-X707ES CD player
    Sony CDP-X505ES CD player
    Topping D90SE DAC
    Sony DVP-NS900V used as a transport only
    Technics SLPG-590 CD player used as a transport only
    Marantz CD6000SE CD player used as a transport only
    Revel Performa3 M105 speakers and matching stands
    Massdrop thxaaa 789 headphone amplifier
    Audeze LCD-XC (2021 Revision) Headphones
    Connecty things: Chord, Accuphase, QED, AoS 'Barry Special', silly cheap Chinese USB cable (AMAZING value hifi product)

  8. #18
    Join Date: Sep 2012

    Location: East Anglia UK

    Posts: 1,219
    I'm Marc.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yomanze View Post
    Read Strat's post above yours for one technical reason.
    I don't see how that's a reason that they don't impart a sonic signature, just that they have better RF rejection (thanks to the phase cancellation of the differential signal). As I mentioned, on the distances we're generally talking about in Hifi, that's unlikely to really make a significant difference really, is it?

    Next you'll be telling me that if I bought a directional audio cable it wouldn't matter which end of the cable I attach the male or female xlr barrel, or some such heresy..

  9. #19
    Join Date: Apr 2014

    Location: Chorley, Lancashire

    Posts: 260
    I'm Steven.

    Default

    Thanks for the interesting replies and offers of help. Hats off to the AoS!

    It looks like this cable thing might not be that straightforward after all. Is it the case then that interconnects make a subtle difference at best? Or am I wrong? Is the person who buys an £18000 interconnect halfway to the funny farm or lucky to have such a thing?

    Has anyone ever had a game changer moment with an interconnect? You know, plug in and go, WOW!

    Sadly, I haven't but then I buy cheap so what should I expect?

    Somebody is buying high end interconnects though. There seems to be quite an industry around this aspect of a hifi system.

    Regards

    Steve
    "Jingoism, racism, fear, religious fundamentalism: these are the ways of appealing to people if you're trying to organize a mass base of support for policies that are really intended to crush them".
    Noam Chomsky

    Current set up:
    Benchmark LA4 pre-amplifier and AHB2 power amplifier
    Sony CDP-X707ES CD player
    Sony CDP-X505ES CD player
    Topping D90SE DAC
    Sony DVP-NS900V used as a transport only
    Technics SLPG-590 CD player used as a transport only
    Marantz CD6000SE CD player used as a transport only
    Revel Performa3 M105 speakers and matching stands
    Massdrop thxaaa 789 headphone amplifier
    Audeze LCD-XC (2021 Revision) Headphones
    Connecty things: Chord, Accuphase, QED, AoS 'Barry Special', silly cheap Chinese USB cable (AMAZING value hifi product)

  10. #20
    Join Date: Oct 2012

    Location: The Black Country

    Posts: 6,089
    I'm Alan.

    Default

    Wow, wow and 'king wow.

    That looks and sounds like from your description the ultimate CD replay equipment.
    I did wonder when it said 8 valves, but 4 of them are rectifiers in the power supply

    Plus the other 4 are 6H30's, just about one of the most linear valves there is

    If there is one item I'd spend lottery winnings on it would be this.

    I love Hendrix for so many reasons. He was so much more than just a blues guitarist - he played damn well any kind of guitar he wanted. In fact I'm not sure if he even played the guitar - he played music. - Stevie Ray Vaughan

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •