I have an itch, a Garrard or Thorens shaped one but I am unsure whether to scratch it or not.
My existing main vinyl playback is via an SME Model 20/Graham Phantom tonearm or a recently upgraded Oracle Delphi turntable, now a mk 4/5/6 upon which an SME 5 tonearm is to be found. My ongoing Technics experiments also continue - though they are coming to an end - via a couple of 1200/1210s with all the usual suspects re arms, PSUs, bearings platters etc. I have a Triplanar mk 7 Ultimate tonearm still to be used which I thought about fitting to the Delphi (have a suitable armboard) and currently have fitted to a Technics 1210 turntable (not tried yet), so that arm could be tried on an idler.
So the question is, and I would propose to use modern arms not vintage, nor vintage carts, is it worthwhile giving an idler in the shape of those mentioned ago ? I would want equals in performance to my belter/direct drive, so if the general feeling is they won't be better or as good then its an itch I won't scratch.
There are plenty of options re used Garrards at the minute - I prefer the look of the 401 over the 301 - and a few Thorens TD124 mk 2s (love the look) but to do this will cost and I am concerned I might be wasting money by trying and then trying to resell so I would prefer to go into this sure I am not going to - well as sure as one can be. A nice used example would be the thought rather than a Audio Grail unit but servicing seems to bring the cost up to a Grail one pretty much. Any thoughts on that ?
One concern is I recently heard an Inspire Enigma turntable and I didn't like the way it did bass, is this an idler issue affecting them all or just turntables based on Lencos ? It was too strong and too driving in my system.
I like the look of these plinths http://www.oldroadaudio.com/product/...or-garrard-401 but not with the Thorens.
Curious what folks think.
Regards Neil