+ Reply to Thread
Page 15 of 28 FirstFirst ... 5131415161725 ... LastLast
Results 141 to 150 of 280

Thread: Yamaha NS1000M - Tweaks

  1. #141
    Join Date: Mar 2008

    Location: Galashiels

    Posts: 13,703
    I'm inthescottishmafia.

    Default

    Use a preamp. A simple passive would do. Connect your sources to it, output from the preamp goes to the miniDSP, then outputs from the miniDSP go to the amps you are using.
    “Music has always been a matter of energy to me, a question of fuel. Sentimental people call it inspiration, but what they really mean is fuel. I have always needed fuel. I am a serious consumer. On some nights I still believe that a car with the gas needle on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio”

    Hunter S Thompson

  2. #142
    Join Date: Oct 2015

    Location: KL, Malaysia

    Posts: 258
    I'm shahrin.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ali Tait View Post
    Use a preamp. A simple passive would do. Connect your sources to it, output from the preamp goes to the miniDSP, then outputs from the miniDSP go to the amps you are using.
    Aha, Ta Don Corleone !

  3. #143
    Join Date: Mar 2008

    Location: Galashiels

    Posts: 13,703
    I'm inthescottishmafia.

    Default

    You need something to act as a master volume control, otherwise you'd be adjusting three volume pots every time you change volume..
    “Music has always been a matter of energy to me, a question of fuel. Sentimental people call it inspiration, but what they really mean is fuel. I have always needed fuel. I am a serious consumer. On some nights I still believe that a car with the gas needle on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio”

    Hunter S Thompson

  4. #144
    Join Date: Jan 2013

    Location: Carlisle - UK

    Posts: 1,991
    I'm Ken.

    Default

    Like Ali says, you need a master volume control on your pre amp even if it is just a simple passive.

    The pots placed between the minidsp and amps are to balance the amount of power distributed to the drivers (call them trim pots), once adjusted to balance the levels the "Trim" pots wont need touching again, you will just use the master volume on the Pre amp. Once the "Trim" pot positions have been established you could even measure the resistance and replace them with a pair of fixed resistors, which would give you better channel balance (pots are never very accurate).

    Note: The 4x10 has a built in volume control (big round knob on the left), so you may be able to run your sources straight into the dsp and control the master volume from there, it depends on how much the output from your various sources varies. To aid with this there is also a pair of dip switches inside the 4x10 unit which gives you a high/low option for input sensitivity of max 2.0v/0.9v. You can also set the output gain to 2.0v or 0.9v, using a combination of these settings gives you a lot of flexibility. - Check out the user manual on their site.

    If you use identical amplifiers, you don't need attenuate the bass amp channels, let them run without any "Trim" pot after the minidsp.
    The bass drivers are the most power hungry, the Mids and Tweeters use less so will require turning down using "Trim" pots till the drivers sound evenly balanced.
    Last edited by Qwin; 06-02-2016 at 15:59.

  5. #145
    Join Date: Oct 2015

    Location: KL, Malaysia

    Posts: 258
    I'm shahrin.

    Default

    Thank you Ali and Ken
    Ok pre amp up front
    4 x10dsp allows some twiddling of input sensitivity and output gain

    Some power amps have in built pots
    The ones i will use probably wont.

    2 of my Sansui integrateds can be used as power amps by removing links (pre out/power in)
    For starters I could use the most powerful power amp to the woofers without any need for trim pots, right?
    And amps feeding the mids and tweeters would need trimming pots to evenly balance the whole set up ( and may later be replaced by set resistors, as u mentioned Ken)
    Is that correct?

    Gents why do some people use such powerful (usually Class D) amps to drive woofers ?
    I note Ali u are using a 3000 watter for yr open baffle 15 '' woofer and Mark uses some sorta big power for the woofers of his NS1000
    Wouldnt a decent 100 wpc amp with headroom be fine ?
    Furthermore the amps powering the mids and tweeters will need trimming and these are hardly breaking into much sweat at all
    ( i note that the Genelac Active NS1000 discussed in a thread here, the amp driving the tweeter on each side is pretty puny)
    So trimming pots between minidsp and the amps driving the tweeters and mids are necessary for balancing, and does this not mean that the amps do not have to be identical ?
    Thorens td124 mk2 / Bokrand AB309/ 103r
    SLAT L75 / Jelco 850S / AT VM740ML
    Marantz CD63 / Bluesound / Musical Paradise 701 II/ ESP 500Hz eXO / PL Prologue 4 and Nord 1UP amps / JK Wynn semiactive NS1000 upgrade
    /ESP 700 Hz eXO / JBL 4333 components

  6. #146
    Join Date: Mar 2010

    Location: Sheffield

    Posts: 2,902
    I'm Simon.

    Default

    Class d is cheap per watt, typically has a high damping factor and its perceived shortcomings tend to be at higher frequencies.
    Kuzma Stabi/S 12", (LP12-bastard) DC motor and optical tacho psu, Benz LP, Paradise (phonostage). MB-Pro, Brooklyn dac and psu, Bruno Putzeys balanced pre, mod86p dual mono amps, Yamaha NS1000m

  7. #147
    Join Date: Aug 2009

    Location: Staffordshire, England

    Posts: 38,078
    I'm Martin.

    Default

    There is also the comfort of having far more power than you are ever likely to need. it's the hi-fi equivalent of nuking the site from orbit, just to be sure.
    Current Lash Up:

    TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > JM Labs Focal Electra 926.

  8. #148
    Join Date: Mar 2008

    Location: Galashiels

    Posts: 13,703
    I'm inthescottishmafia.

    Default

    What Simon said. I was previously using a Ruby Chameleon 200w power amp. The Behringer is cheaper, runs cooler and sounds better. Cheaper to run too.

    But no reason not to use what you have already.
    “Music has always been a matter of energy to me, a question of fuel. Sentimental people call it inspiration, but what they really mean is fuel. I have always needed fuel. I am a serious consumer. On some nights I still believe that a car with the gas needle on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio”

    Hunter S Thompson

  9. #149
    Join Date: Nov 2011

    Location: Newcastle UK

    Posts: 3,745
    I'm Rich.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Macca View Post
    There is also the comfort of having far more power than you are ever likely to need. it's the hi-fi equivalent of nuking the site from orbit, just to be sure.
    Hahaha, I like that.
    One of these days... I'm going to cut you into little pieces.

  10. #150
    Join Date: Nov 2011

    Location: Newcastle UK

    Posts: 3,745
    I'm Rich.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sq225917 View Post
    Class d is cheap per watt, typically has a high damping factor and its perceived shortcomings tend to be at higher frequencies.
    Not so much the higher frequencies I found, I loved my mini-t for the treble and mid but there's something about how it did bass just didn't sit right with me when compared to a SS amp with a nice big torroidal.
    One of these days... I'm going to cut you into little pieces.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 15 of 28 FirstFirst ... 5131415161725 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •