+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: camera query

  1. Default

    Thanks for these comments. Very interesting.

    I should have made it clear I'm after a digital camera. I'm happy to buy secondhand. I would like the flexibility that multiple lenses offer and, although it's a drag to carry them around, that's what I am used to.

    My old cameras were Pentaxes. Do we think that their K and M mount lenses would fit their digital bodies?

    Hamish, thanks for your ideas in particular. I'll do the research you suggest. It'll be a background task for me, so I may not come back immediately. Sounds like a full SLR is what I need. Decades ago, I was advised to buy the camera which felt easiest in the hand - hence the purchase of the Pentaxes.

  2. #12
    Join Date: Mar 2009

    Location: Elland

    Posts: 6,922
    I'm David.

    Default

    as well as doing photography for a living i also have worked in camera sales for about 4 years now (although nowadays only a day a week) i am as obsessed with cameras and photography as most people on here are about hifi (belive it or not hifi is my secondary hobby) so i am more than very happy to help

    i have just mentioned this on another thread about scanners but if you would like me to help more, pm me, and i could give you the number of the shop and let you know the day i am there for some no obligation proper advice!
    a good few people on this forum have been very good to me of late and i would like to be able to put something back into the "community" and as i know more about cameras it seems to me a good way of helping out!

    old pentax lenses fit on modern cameras but you have to guess the esposure as they dont relay any info to the camera not even what apeture its set to.. it can be a fiddle, but sometimes worth the trouble
    one thing to point out of great importance is you will also have to multiply you focal length by 1.5 (50mm becomes 75mm) as the sensor is smaller than the surface of 35mm film. a standard lens on on a digi slr is 30mm ish, so when you see a 18-55mm lens on a dslr its actually, in film terms, aprox a 28-82mm
    CS Port TAT2 - Benz LPS - Funkfirm Houdini - DS Audio Vinyl Ionizer - CS Port C3EQ - Kondo G70 - Kondo Gakuoh II - Maxonic TW1100 MKII - Isol-8 SubStation Integra

  3. #13
    Alex_UK's Avatar
    Alex_UK is offline Spotify + Facebook Moderator / Chilled-Out Wino and only here for the shilling
    Join Date: Aug 2009

    Location: Sunny Suffolk, UK

    Posts: 15,952
    I'm WrappingALilacCurtainAroundMyBobby.

    Default

    That's interesting, the multiplier is 1.6 with Canon, (50mm becomes 80mm) when using EF (35mm) rather than EF-S lenses, so a slight difference there between the others, though not really that significant!

    Good to know we have a specialist onboard, I might be after some of your expertise if I ever have any money left after I've spent it all on hi-fi!
    Alex

    Main System: Digital: HP Laptop/M2Tech Hiface/Logitech Media Server/FLAC; Marantz SA7001 KI Signature SACD Player and other digital stuff into Gatorised Beresford Caiman DAC Vinyl: Garrard 401/SME 3009 SII Improved/Sumiko HS/Nagaoka MP-30
    Amplifier: Rega Brio R. Speakers: Spendor SP1. Cables: Various, mainly Mark Grant.
    Please see "about me" for the rest of my cr@p! Gallery


    A.o.S. on Facebook - A.o.S. on Spotify - A.o.S. on Twitter

    There is only one way to avoid criticism: do nothing, say nothing and be nothing Aristotle

  4. #14
    Join Date: Mar 2009

    Location: Elland

    Posts: 6,922
    I'm David.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alex_UK View Post
    That's interesting, the multiplier is 1.6 with Canon, (50mm becomes 80mm) when using EF (35mm) rather than EF-S lenses, so a slight difference there between the others, though not really that significant!

    Good to know we have a specialist onboard, I might be after some of your expertise if I ever have any money left after I've spent it all on hi-fi!
    i have never been 100% sure if there i a difference in size between the canon "aps-c" format and nikons "dx" format... i gave up worrying about it a long time ago and have just decided to stick to the rough idea that for the most part the entry level brands are aprox 1.5x, apart from the 4/3rds that are 2x

    i have an idea that it is more like 1.56x for both canon and nikon and its just diffent marketing in the early days of the format that has created confusion, but i might very well be wrong!!

    still, in my world 1.5x isnt going to be too far off... and the maths is easier

    just to add a bit more confusion

    canon also used to have the aps-h sensors which were 1.3x
    leica m8 is also 1.3x (i think)


    i was so happy when i got my d3 with its full frame 24x36(ish) sensor... i stoped having to worry about it. my 85mm 1.4 actually became a 84 1.4 ..happy days!!


    some light reading -

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_lens
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crop_factor
    Last edited by The Vinyl Adventure; 12-08-2009 at 11:45.
    CS Port TAT2 - Benz LPS - Funkfirm Houdini - DS Audio Vinyl Ionizer - CS Port C3EQ - Kondo G70 - Kondo Gakuoh II - Maxonic TW1100 MKII - Isol-8 SubStation Integra

  5. #15
    Join Date: Mar 2009

    Location: Elland

    Posts: 6,922
    I'm David.

    Default

    just had a quick mooch around the internet and i still cant find a conclusive answer as to weather canons sensors are slightly smaller... like i said for the difference it makes in real terms i gave up giving a toss a long while ago
    i have literally just seen respectable webs site giving contradictory info on the subject...
    CS Port TAT2 - Benz LPS - Funkfirm Houdini - DS Audio Vinyl Ionizer - CS Port C3EQ - Kondo G70 - Kondo Gakuoh II - Maxonic TW1100 MKII - Isol-8 SubStation Integra

  6. #16
    Alex_UK's Avatar
    Alex_UK is offline Spotify + Facebook Moderator / Chilled-Out Wino and only here for the shilling
    Join Date: Aug 2009

    Location: Sunny Suffolk, UK

    Posts: 15,952
    I'm WrappingALilacCurtainAroundMyBobby.

    Default

    Canon itself says 1.6 - Canon Sensor Info - but like you said, I wouldn't worry about it when comparing cameras.
    Alex

    Main System: Digital: HP Laptop/M2Tech Hiface/Logitech Media Server/FLAC; Marantz SA7001 KI Signature SACD Player and other digital stuff into Gatorised Beresford Caiman DAC Vinyl: Garrard 401/SME 3009 SII Improved/Sumiko HS/Nagaoka MP-30
    Amplifier: Rega Brio R. Speakers: Spendor SP1. Cables: Various, mainly Mark Grant.
    Please see "about me" for the rest of my cr@p! Gallery


    A.o.S. on Facebook - A.o.S. on Spotify - A.o.S. on Twitter

    There is only one way to avoid criticism: do nothing, say nothing and be nothing Aristotle

  7. #17
    Join Date: Mar 2009

    Location: Elland

    Posts: 6,922
    I'm David.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alex_UK View Post
    Canon itself says 1.6 - Canon Sensor Info - but like you said, I wouldn't worry about it when comparing cameras.
    good old canon website the only place i didnt think to look!

    i found some facts:

    Nikon DX 23.6 mm × 15.8 mm (d300) 1.5x ish
    Canon aps-c 22.3 mm x 14.9 mm (50d) 1.6x ish

    so canon are slightly smaller

    but yeah it makes no odds, in real terms very few people would ever notice a difference
    CS Port TAT2 - Benz LPS - Funkfirm Houdini - DS Audio Vinyl Ionizer - CS Port C3EQ - Kondo G70 - Kondo Gakuoh II - Maxonic TW1100 MKII - Isol-8 SubStation Integra

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •