Location: London
Posts: 1,499
I'm Sam.
Location: London
Posts: 1,499
I'm Sam.
Totally wrong?
Have we had the judgement posted up? I haven't been through the whole thread so it is a genuine question.
I guess there is a danger in arguing without the absolute facts in front of us, and that also discounts the statements of those directly involved who obviously have their own interests and beliefs colouring their views.
Baliffs are baliffs. They are only officers of the court if the court has instructed them to act. I'm not sure that is the case here is it? Might be, but I got the impression not. My boss is pursuing someone for unpaid invoices, has been to mediation meetings via small claims courts and had judgments against the guy... but all action he's taken to chase the money has had to have been private, not instructed by the court, and that for more money than at stake here (yet still under the small claims threshold). I find that when I read people talking about small claims and what they think the judgement has been etc etc, many people make wrongful assumptions because they are understandably new to the whole process.
Also I think people get mightily confused between civil law and criminal law - to most people the "law is the law". Civil matters are quite different and even sticking to the terms of a judgement isn't necessary if the situation is resolved via compromise so that people are satisfied, it's called settlement. That could have happened long long long ago if it weren't for the protagonist's attitudes..
Last edited by Audio Advent; 17-05-2015 at 05:21.
Location: London
Posts: 1,499
I'm Sam.
How the hell "oh, this hasn't got a remote like I asked!" and some damaged-in-transit valves got to this stage blows my mind!
One thing I am sure of from reading some of this is that BOTH the people involved have only themselves to blame ! Such idiots in my humble opinion - pride and stubborness can make people look supremely stupid.
Quite so.
From the start I thought we were getting half a story and nothing I have read since has convinced me that I have seen enough to condemn either party more than the other. The power to communicate is what got humans to where we are but clearly, we are going backwards if this is an example.
Guys, now that the amp has been fully assessed, and fixed, it will indeed (in due course) be getting auctioned, with the proceeds from that donated to charity. That arrangement was agreed between the seller and I some time back.
Therefore, I don't wish to regurgitate the argument of 'who's to blame' for this incident, and for the discussion, in that respect, to go round and round in circles, so I think it's time to close this one now, pending an announcement in due course as to how the auction will be conducted and when it will take place.
Marco.
Main System
Turntable: Heavily-modified Technics SL-1210MK5G [Mike New bearing/ETP platter/Paul Hynes SR7 PSU & reg mods]. Funk Firm APM Achromat/Nagaoka GL-601 Crystal Record Weight/Isonoe feet & boots/Ortofon RS-212D/Denon DL-103GL in Denon PCL-300 headshell with Funk Firm Houdini/Kondo SL-115 pure-silver cartridge leads.
Paul Hynes MC head amp/SR5 PSU. Also modded Lentek head amp/Denon AU-310 SUT.
Other Cartridges: Nippon Columbia (NOS 1987) Denon DL-103. USA-made Shure SC35C with NOS stylus. Goldring G820 with NOS stylus. Shure M55E with NOS stylus.
CD Player: Audiocom-modified Sony X-777ES/DAS-R1 DAC.
Tape Deck: Tandberg TCD 310, fully restored and recalibrated as new, by RDE, plus upgraded with heads from the TCD-420a. Also with matching TM4 Norway microphones.
Preamps: Heavily-modified Croft Charisma-X. LDR Stereo Coffee. Power Amps: Tube Distinctions Copper Amp fitted with Tungsol KT-150s. Quad 306.
Cables & Sundries: Mark Grant HDX1 interconnects and digital coaxial cable, plus Mark Grant 6mm UP-LCOFC Van Damme speaker cable. MCRU 'Ultimate' mains leads. Lehmann clone headphone amp with vintage Koss PRO-4AAA headphones.
Tube Distinctions digital noise filter. VPI HW16.5 record cleaning machine.
Speakers: Tannoy 15MGs in Lockwood cabinets with modified crossovers. 1967 Celestion Ditton 15.
Protect your HUMAN RIGHTS and REFUSE ANY *MANDATORY* VACCINE FOR COVID-19!
Also **SAY NO** to unjust 'vaccine passports' or certificates, which are totally incompatible with a FREE society!!!
I'd suggest those commenting on this situation read the entire thread before doing so.
But I am feeling charitable so here is a précis
The matter has been to court three times, including the High Court. All three times the Court found in favour of the plaintiff.
The Plaintiff is owed a full refund of what he paid plus costs. That was the High Court decision, based on the evidence presented by both sides.
Settlement or recovery, despite a High Court writ, have proven impossible.
The plaintiff is fed up of the whole issue and wants the amp gone. He has agreed it will be fixed and sold for charity. He will remain out of pocket.
Current Lash Up:
TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > JM Labs Focal Electra 926.