+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: best sound out of a laptop ?

  1. #11
    Join Date: Sep 2012

    Location: East Anglia UK

    Posts: 1,219
    I'm Marc.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by star View Post

    does my pc have any sound card ? at system information ,all it says is , high definition audio device by Microsoft "
    Probably, if you want you could probably just use a 3.5mm jack to RCA (aka 'the most useful cable in the world') to take a feed from the jack output of your laptop in to your amplifier to get you started.

    IMO it's best to keep signal chains and stages as short and minimal as possible so pick a device that works, you can afford, offers the features you need etc and keep it simple!

  2. #12
    Join Date: Aug 2011

    Location: Bacau, Romania

    Posts: 1,215
    I'm Bob.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rothchild View Post
    Probably, if you want you could probably just use a 3.5mm jack to RCA (aka 'the most useful cable in the world') to take a feed from the jack output of your laptop in to your amplifier to get you started.

    IMO it's best to keep signal chains and stages as short and minimal as possible so pick a device that works, you can afford, offers the features you need etc and keep it simple!
    Agreed that a Y cable adaptor can get you going, but you are then reliant on the quality of reproduction offered by the onboard audio, which can vary quite markedly.
    If I plug the audio output direct from the laptop (Lenovo Win7) into the headphone DAC/AMP, the difference in quality between the 3.5mm feed and the usb outlet is very obvious through the cans.
    There again, that is why there is a market for such usb devices, the decoding etc is done at the DAC... Well worth it...

  3. #13
    Join Date: Aug 2013

    Location: New York City, USA.

    Posts: 4
    I'm star.

    Red face HDMI vs. Optical or Digital Coax.

    Quote Originally Posted by StanleyB View Post
    I have done my own listening and measurements between TOSLINK and coax and I am happy with my preference for TOSLINK if the design is right. a TOSLINK signal is far larger in amplitude compared to a coax signal. So TOSLINK signals are easier to reclock with a simple schmitt trigger circuit. Supply noise has less of an effect on the actual signal from a TOSLINK socket. The noise would only affect the electronics inside the socket.
    A coax signal needs to be amplified first from 0.6V to at least 2.7V. That can be an issue in a design.
    There are also no earth loops issues with TOSLINK.
    HDMI vs. Optical or Digital Coax.

    HDMI gives more clarity and detail ? are better quality ?

    http://www.apartmenttherapy.com/understanding-the-differences-between-hdmi-optical-coaxial-rca-cables-184572http:url]http://www.avsforum.com/t/1348062/hdmi-vs-optical-or-digital-coaxhttp://www.avsforum.com/t/1348062/hdmi-vs-optical-or-digital-coax[/url]

    do I need the s'pdif altogether ??
    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...6185928AAdfQVF
    Last edited by star; 29-08-2013 at 20:54. Reason: adding

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •