Hi Marco.
If that was your intention, I'm afraid it didn't come across that way. If you look at your words that I quoted, the discussion of HFS or NVA was to be strictly banned "not only in his thread, but throughout the forum in future".
To me, this looks like you're saying such discussion would be banned henceforth on this reopened thread until it is closed and then also banned from the forum in future. It wouldn't make sense to ban mention of HFS or RD on this thread after it was closed because nobody could post anyway.
Your comments also made it clear that you had only reopened the thread for balance and comments on NVA interconnects, not all the other stuff. To me, your rationale of not wanting AoS to be infected with "poison" would make it difficult to see why the off-topic posts on his thread are something you'd want to carry on. If we return to the OP and his question, it looks like massive thread crapping to me.
Just so I'm not quoting you out of context and to save anyone flicking back, here is your post in entirety:
"Ok, the thread was closed last night because I was going to bed and didn't want to log into the forum in the morning with all sorts of pish having kicked off overnight!
Anyway, I'm out all day today, so the thread will remain locked until I return, when at that point I *may* consider re-opening it. However, if so, it'll only be to summarise and conclude the issues raised about NVA interconnects, including allowing anyone else, such as Andrew, who has had positive experiences with said cables, the opportunity to say so and provide some balance against the criticism."
However, any discussion about RD or HFS will be strictly banned, not only on this thread, but throughout the forum in future (there will be an announcement made to this effect in due course), as I no longer want AoS infected with that poison."