Location: gone
Posts: 11,519
I'm gone.
Current Lash Up:
TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > JM Labs Focal Electra 926.
Location: fuck off
Posts: 2,033
I'm fuckoff.
Apologies for the mistake Jerry!
I'm impatiently awaiting the Sanders amp today, 1st time I'll have had a power amp in the system!
I'm also going to try a different angle of attack, no pre-amp in the chain; simple is better (supposedly) and will be using Jrivers 64bit volume.
You gents ever tried that approach, when using power amps?
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,940
I'm Tom.
Yes Martin, I am very pleased with this little Thule amp. When I sold the XTZ there was a huge sense of foreboding what I was going to get as replacement for the XTZ that had the same welly and musicality. I spent many hours on ebay rejecting a vast amount of amps I knew wouldn't fit the bill and this Thule was another one of those "collection only" listings that mercifully the vendor agreed to letting a courier collect. It had the original shipping box so it was laziness really that he couldn't be arsed to post.
The reviews say the Thule has a prodigious bass output and they are not wrong, but in my tiny room with some small JBL standmounters it works beautifully
Hi Frank
They have a good rep the Thule although I've not heard one meself. I guess you sold it to Jerry? Anyway I think the XTZ overkill power wise for your system - it is a watts and current amp on the cheap really, for people like me who won't spring for big Musical Fidelitys or Krells. Don't belive in this 'musical' amplifier thing though as I said at the start of the thread. Amps for me are like engines - it will either drive the car along satisfactorily or it won't, a bit simplistic I know but that's me
Current Lash Up:
TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > JM Labs Focal Electra 926.
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,940
I'm Tom.
Really am pleased with the little Thule to be honest. It certainly puts plenty of other amp I have owned in the shade.
I didn't sell my XTZ to Jerry, I sold mine on ebay to a chap who was most insistent on buying it for not much less than new price
I am sure I read that Jerry got his XTZ integrated through some sort of swap deal.
Location: gone
Posts: 11,519
I'm gone.
I've just got back from a week away, and turned on the ol' stereo - which was still wired up with the XTZ amp.
A/B comparisons aside - it sounds fab, it really does.
I have to conclude that I could easily live with the XTZ for the long term if my boxswap-fun had to be curtailed.
I can't hear any difference between 'class A' mode and class AB, this perhaps related to the sliding bias arrangement previously described, so given the big difference in heat dissipation, and hence presumably leccy useage, I always have mine on in AB mode.
Yup, I got mine as part of a swap deal with a Wammer for my Ming Da 18W SET valve amp. The XTZ certainly drives my speakers better than the Ming! - but then my speakers are designed to work with hundreds of solid state watts.
.
That concurs with my findings re the class A option, I came to the same conclusion. It does puzzle me when people refer to the 'quality of the watts' when talking about amplfiers, as though a mega-bucks amp puts out some 'better' power somehow, than a cheaper alternative.
I did wonder about your loudspeakers, Jerry. They do look like they need a fair bit of power but then I recall you saying you had good results with a T-amp that can only deliver a couple of watts.
Current Lash Up:
TEAC VRDS 701T > Sony TAE1000ESD > Krell KSA50S > JM Labs Focal Electra 926.
Location: gone
Posts: 11,519
I'm gone.
Yep, I very much enjoy the leetle 8wpc Amptastic Mini-T with the MBLs, although others don't agree with me on this! - but I have to (reluctantly!) admit that they only really show their full capability with a serious amount of power up the jacksie.
.