+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: E88CC recommendations?

  1. #21
    Join Date: Apr 2009

    Location: Italy ( Bologna )

    Posts: 80
    I'm Simon.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OneyedK View Post
    Have a look here:
    6n23p
    It seems the measured 6N23P is not an exact substitute for ECC88.

    In circuits designed with GlassWare TubeCAD for the ECC88, an actual 6N1P measures the same...
    Doesn't surprise me - I think I'll keep my fingers crossed and get a couple of 6N1P -VI's and have a play around. I don't expect that the Audion's transformer will have too difficult a time of it - isn't hi-fi all about over-speccing circuits?
    God is dead, Marx is dead - and I'm not feeling that great Myself...

  2. #22
    Join Date: May 2008

    Location: U.S.A. Neo-Socialist Kalifornski

    Posts: 3,262

    Default

    Asking for tube recomandations is like asking what new car to buy as it's really a matter of how it sounds in your total system and of course personal taste.
    I had the Audion Silver Night phono (a fist run)they used the pre amp Silver Night chassis back then.
    The 6922's I liked best are these (hands down) that includes NOS tubes like Mullard,Phillips,RCA and Tungsram ect...
    It is the only tube I would use in your phono stage, because they are not monophonic, they have no back ground noise and the presentation is stunning.
    They are new and sold in closely matched sets,and you won't be disappointed.

    http://thetubestore.com/goldlione88cc.html
    Jeff :UBERTHREADKILLER

  3. #23
    Join Date: Nov 2012

    Location: Mechelen, Belgium

    Posts: 164
    I'm Karl.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by goraman View Post
    because they are not monophonic
    What is "monophonic"?
    Technics SL-1200 Mk2 recapped / MN bearing / Funk Firm Platter / Denon 103R / Lundahl LL1933
    Thorens TD 126 MkIII / SME Series III / Ortofon SME 30H // AT-OC9ML/II / Lundahl LL1681
    Thorens TD 160 / TP16 / Stanton 681SE

  4. #24
    Join Date: Aug 2012

    Location: Perth and Kinross

    Posts: 37
    I'm Andrew.

    Default

    At the risking starting an "oh yes it is, no it isn't debate" please bear in mind the 61NP is not the same as the ECC88, you can often use them interchange-ably but they are not the same. I believe the 6N23P is closer but I don't have any experience with them.

    I only say this so that anyone rolling tubes is aware of the differences and the possibility of, however remote, of damage. Please study the data sheets for yourselves and make up your own minds that the best advice I can give.

    Andrew
    Last edited by AndrewL; 25-11-2012 at 13:06.

  5. #25
    Join Date: May 2008

    Location: U.S.A. Neo-Socialist Kalifornski

    Posts: 3,262

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OneyedK View Post
    What is "monophonic"?
    Some tubes are prone to making noise at the slightest vibration from even a little bass. Some can be so bad just touching the volume knob can be heard.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microphonics
    Jeff :UBERTHREADKILLER

  6. #26
    Join Date: Nov 2012

    Location: Mechelen, Belgium

    Posts: 164
    I'm Karl.

    Default

    Ah, ok, microphonic, that I know... Too well...
    Technics SL-1200 Mk2 recapped / MN bearing / Funk Firm Platter / Denon 103R / Lundahl LL1933
    Thorens TD 126 MkIII / SME Series III / Ortofon SME 30H // AT-OC9ML/II / Lundahl LL1681
    Thorens TD 160 / TP16 / Stanton 681SE

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •