+ Reply to Thread
Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678
Results 71 to 76 of 76

Thread: Review: Angle Audio phono stage

  1. #71
    Join Date: Jan 2008

    Location: gone

    Posts: 11,519
    I'm gone.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zappa100 View Post
    I currently use a standard Dino mk 2.Maybe i would be better looking into a better psu ?
    The standard Dino PSU does it no favours whatsoever! You are getting about 20% of the performance that the Dino is capable of - I kid you not.

    A Trichord NCPSU is fab, as is the Avondale PSU that I have with my Mk2 Dino.
    .

  2. #72
    Join Date: Mar 2010

    Location: Manchester, UK

    Posts: 37
    I'm Pete.

    Default

    Thanks.
    Will see if i can find a nice dealer to borrow one from...
    Pete.

  3. #73
    Join Date: Oct 2011

    Location: Eastern Europe

    Posts: 11
    I'm Eimantas.

    Default

    I modded the stock PSU with LM317T and the preamp is DEAD silent as never before!



    7815 is truly noisy...

  4. #74
    Join Date: Feb 2016

    Location: yorkshire

    Posts: 61
    I'm terry.

    Default angle audio

    Hi, just installed ANGLE AUDIO REF 2 MC/MM phono stage.
    Initial impressions impressive, betters the built in Quad 99 pre phono, both MM/MC.
    Perhaps not as involving as the EAR834P but only first listen, will need time to settle.
    One noticeable thing, very very quiet, even with the Denon 103r ,

  5. #75
    Join Date: Mar 2016

    Location: Nottingham, UK

    Posts: 160
    I'm Simon.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by keiths View Post
    So in conclusion, I find this phono stage to be a vast improvement on the Cambridge Audio one with an excellent, well-balanced sound throughout and is great value for £145.
    Hi,

    I appreciate that this review is a few years old, but I've just been looking at phono stages and this piqued my interest. However, rather than £145 the current price on eBay appears to be £329 - a bit of a jump!

    My other option is a Pro-ject Tube Box DS - how do the two compare?

  6. #76
    Join Date: Mar 2016

    Location: Nottingham, UK

    Posts: 160
    I'm Simon.

    Default

    OK, I've done a bit of research and the £329 one has upgraded components. It looks like this one at £199 is the equivalent of the one reviewed.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •