+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Garrard Loricraft Power Supply

  1. #1
    Join Date: Oct 2008

    Location: Italy

    Posts: 65

    Default Garrard Loricraft Power Supply

    Hello,

    does anyone use the Garrard-Loricraft Power Supply for the 301 or 401?
    I would be interested to asking something about the size of the transformer.

    A similar, cheaper, DIY product from Dr. Bernhard Fuss in Germany that I own gave me great results with smaller belt drives (like AudioNote TT1, Thorens 125) but with my 401 even if it's upsized to 35 Watt it lacks an power and therefore the 401 sounds more detailed without this power supply.
    This power supply de-constructs the electrical power creating a constant 50Hz frequency for the motor. A sort of Lingo but analogue

    Ciao from Rome,

    Piero

  2. #2
    Join Date: Feb 2008

    Location: Boddam Aberdeenshire

    Posts: 272

    Default

    Hi Piero,
    I have never used the Loricraft power supply, but unlike most other designs this was designed for the Garrard motors and a version is used on Loricrafts own Garrard 501. As you rightly suggest, most turntable power supplies lack the ability to properly drive the Garrard motors, as they were designed for the much weaker motors used for belt drive decks.
    I have a link here for the Loricraft PSU's

    http://www.garrard501.com/psu2.html

    expensive aren't they?
    "Always carry a large flagon of whisky, in case of snake bite and, furthermore, always carry a small snake."


    Kevin

  3. #3
    Join Date: Apr 2008

    Location: Bristol, UK

    Posts: 441
    I'm Greg.

    Default

    Hi Piero,

    There have been several attempts at PSU's for the Garrard idler TT's over the years and generally they have not been successful. There used to be a tweak whereby you introduced a 40W lightbulb in series in the +ive supply to reduce voltage which was heralded for improving the sound. That was a rubbish claim. All it did was reduce torque from the motor which could effect sound making it less dynamic. I spent a while experimenting on this and several friends tried PSU's such as the Dr Imbabi design and also one from the now defunct White noise company. All of them degraded the sound simply to gain some linearity on speed control.

    The original Garrard boys knew their stuff. The good sound of a Garrard ID deck is much because the motor is seriously torquey and the speed control system is about applying braking to hold it back rather than trying to regulate the speed. Consequently the torque element remains very much the factor in the standard design. After experiment, my experience is that the standard original setup is best. If you live in an area with wildly varying mains voltage, I can understand you considering a PSU option, but it will be a compromise I can assure you and it'll be sound quality and dynamics where you'll lose out. Generally I put up with the variability of mains voltage and adjust speed if necessary between LP sides.

    I hope that helps.

    Best wishes,

    Greg
    Last edited by Cotlake; 30-10-2008 at 22:11. Reason: Smelling Pistakes

  4. #4
    Join Date: Oct 2008

    Location: Italy

    Posts: 65

    Default

    Hi Greg,

    what you have written corresponds 100% with my impressions.

    We made a hear test with an LP of the golden age (Mercury Living Stereo Le Sacre du printemps directed by A.Dorati) with PSU the scene was really weak, some instrument lost force, but anyway the frequency was exactly 50HZ!

    Without PSU all the power of the 401 came out again, instruments were more detailed, practically another, better, deck.

    I asked about Loricraft's PSU because in one picture from inside I saw a big trafo and maybe so I argued it could work better with Garrards?

    On the other side the PSU works good with belt drives like Linn, Thorens, Systemdeck .... but without the power of the idler wheel.

    I never could imagine before how good and balanced can sound a perfect set up Garrard with a massive plynth, a 12 inch tonearm, on a bombproof rack ...
    Last edited by Historicus; 30-10-2008 at 21:58.

  5. #5
    Join Date: Apr 2008

    Location: Bristol, UK

    Posts: 441
    I'm Greg.

    Default

    Hi Piero,

    Yes you are right. I remain convinced that the original Garrard people really knew what they were doing. You are certainly right about mounting. You really can't beat a Slatedeck http://www.slatedeck.com/ for your 301/401 and then coupled to a rigid floor or wall mount. In my view it ends up being high end vinyl based audio on the cheap. Incidentally, regarding the Garrard expertise, I've experimented with mats for the platter and after all the trials I've found the best sounding option is the original rubber mat fitted on it's own just as supplied with the original TT is best. Makes you think a bit about how far we've come and who is out there trying to con the punter.

    Best wishes,

    Greg

  6. #6
    Join Date: Oct 2008

    Location: Italy

    Posts: 65

    Default

    Hi Greg,
    tutte le vie portano a Roma ... all roads carry to rome. I have found out the miraculous features of slate. Liguria is the home country of marvelous slate. Every component of my equipment that turns, conditions, transduced, etc. has his slate base with incredible results! I own one of these plynths made in germany which is as Loricraft ones but much better designed and assembled http://www.audio-kreativ.de/html/garrard.html
    The rigid floor DIY Garrard rack is a 5x5 iron table filled with (warmed up) river sand, big spikes on the floor and a 85x75 slate on the top on air bubbles. My TT has the Sicomin absorbers too. The electrical line with oversized wiring is dedicated only for this equipment. The results are stunning in reference to my original 401 that had an empty britt' sewing case as plynth and the still overrated 3009/II. Now with this german plynth, the base and a 13inch tonearm it's just music!

    Can you tell me the differences (in sound qualities) between the 2 models of 301 and 401? 301 sells at his best BUT discovering better sound traits is not an easy job!

    Ciao from Rome,

    Piero

  7. #7
    Join Date: Jan 2008

    Location: Wrexham, North Wales, UK

    Posts: 110,012
    I'm AudioAl'sArbiterForPISHANTO.

    Default

    Ciao Piero,

    Just to butt in quickly... I was wondering if your Auditorium 23 step-up transformer has arrived yet?

    Marco.
    Main System

    Turntable: Heavily-modified Technics SL-1210MK5G [Mike New bearing/ETP platter/Paul Hynes SR7 PSU & reg mods]. Funk Firm APM Achromat/Nagaoka GL-601 Crystal Record Weight/Isonoe feet & boots/Ortofon RS-212D/Denon DL-103GL in Denon PCL-300 headshell with Funk Firm Houdini/Kondo SL-115 pure-silver cartridge leads.

    Paul Hynes MC head amp/SR5 PSU. Also modded Lentek head amp/Denon AU-310 SUT.

    Other Cartridges: Nippon Columbia (NOS 1987) Denon DL-103. USA-made Shure SC35C with NOS stylus. Goldring G820 with NOS stylus. Shure M55E with NOS stylus.

    CD Player: Audiocom-modified Sony X-777ES/DAS-R1 DAC.

    Tape Deck: Tandberg TCD 310, fully restored and recalibrated as new, by RDE, plus upgraded with heads from the TCD-420a. Also with matching TM4 Norway microphones.

    Preamps: Heavily-modified Croft Charisma-X. LDR Stereo Coffee. Power Amps: Tube Distinctions Copper Amp fitted with Tungsol KT-150s. Quad 306.

    Cables & Sundries: Mark Grant HDX1 interconnects and digital coaxial cable, plus Mark Grant 6mm UP-LCOFC Van Damme speaker cable. MCRU 'Ultimate' mains leads. Lehmann clone headphone amp with vintage Koss PRO-4AAA headphones.

    Tube Distinctions digital noise filter. VPI HW16.5 record cleaning machine.

    Speakers: Tannoy 15MGs in Lockwood cabinets with modified crossovers. 1967 Celestion Ditton 15.


    Protect your HUMAN RIGHTS and REFUSE ANY *MANDATORY* VACCINE FOR COVID-19!

    Also **SAY NO** to unjust 'vaccine passports' or certificates, which are totally incompatible with a FREE society!!!


  8. #8
    Join Date: Oct 2008

    Location: Italy

    Posts: 65

    Default

    Hi Marco, A23 is still on the road.
    Audiocom didn't answer to a private mail posted through this board is it possible that it got lost?
    Buon fine settimana, e' festa da voi domani come qui?

    Piero

  9. #9
    Join Date: Aug 2008

    Location: Suffolk, UK

    Posts: 1,473
    I'm Paul.

    Default

    I believe the problem with the PSU's for Garrard 301 & 401's is that they have a higher output impedance than the mains. Mains may be fairly poor in terms of cleaness and flucuation but it does have a very low output impedance.

    The only thing I know that is supposed to have low output impedance are the PS Audio Power Plants that Howard sells. I haven't tried it with my Garrard but hope to one day.
    ~Paul~

  10. #10
    Join Date: Oct 2008

    Location: Italy

    Posts: 65

    Default

    Ciao Paul, thanks for your hint about the possible different impedances between the 301&401 and the mains. Now a friend, also garrardista, disects my PSU to find out where is the real problem.

    Ciao from Rome,

    Piero

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •