Seems to me there are no rules when it comes to perceived sound.
Some decouple, some don't.
Some clamp, Some don't.
Some direct, Some belt.
Some analogue, Some digital.
Some Valve, Some transistor.
Bla bla bla bla bla..........
Basically the rules of sound club are -
1. There are no rules.
2. There are no rules.
3. There are no rules.
If you like it you like it.
If you don't then you don't. Simples...
In - Tweaked Lenco GL75, Linn Ittok, Ortofon Cadenza Black
Through - Croft Micro 25 RS LS, power R monoblocks, RIAA R. Ortofon ST-80 SE SUT.
Along - Tellurium Q Ultra Black cables
Out - Harbeth SHL5 Plus XD's
Street photography
Dave
Can be an expensive business trying things out when theres no difinitive rules.
I did just make a subwoofer platform for a tenner that made a big difference so im feeling pretty smug at the moment. It sort of cancels out some of the expensive mistakes ive made in the past.
Sorry i forgot i mentioned my platform already. Memory is going a bit
In my set-up the spike is coupled to the disc and the disc decouples from floor, somewhat.
As far as absolutes or rules for audio, I can think of a few.
Wood sounds better than concrete or most other materials.
NOS tubes always sound better than tubes produced after about 1980.
Paper speaker drivers sound more human that exotic material drivers.
Tweeters suck.
Analog is more satisfying than digital, for music.
Cheers,
Cliff
Location: Yorks
Posts: 16,643
I'm Nobody.
Andre, I can't get your agreement on even one of my axioms?
What about "tweeters suck"? Surely that isn't controversial.
Location: Yorks
Posts: 16,643
I'm Nobody.
Depends which tweeters
You are right: that axiom needs amending.
I don't like tweeters, and nobody (should) like tweeters that sound like tweeters.
I think that is better.
Agree on paper cones. Always gone back to them as they sound the most natural to me.