+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Which is better?

  1. #11
    Join Date: Dec 2008

    Location: Yorks

    Posts: 16,643
    I'm Nobody.

    Default

    I just use what ever length plonking my stereo where i want it, works out to..

  2. #12
    Join Date: Jan 2008

    Location: Wrexham, North Wales, UK

    Posts: 110,012
    I'm AudioAl'sArbiterForPISHANTO.

    Default

    No worries, Dave. I'm sure that's good advice for Rob. It won't do any harm to experiment though with some Belden or Van Damme cable, as it costs buttons.

    Neither the 66s nor 15XRs, with the copper amp, seem to mind the 14m of cable either side it takes to connect the former to the latter when the former are downstairs in the lounge

    I've never tried the Lockwoods with very long speaker cable lengths (as they've always lived in my listening room), so don't know how they'd react.

    Marco.
    Main System

    Turntable: Heavily-modified Technics SL-1210MK5G [Mike New bearing/ETP platter/Paul Hynes SR7 PSU & reg mods]. Funk Firm APM Achromat/Nagaoka GL-601 Crystal Record Weight/Isonoe feet & boots/Ortofon RS-212D/Denon DL-103GL in Denon PCL-300 headshell with Funk Firm Houdini/Kondo SL-115 pure-silver cartridge leads.

    Paul Hynes MC head amp/SR5 PSU. Also modded Lentek head amp/Denon AU-310 SUT.

    Other Cartridges: Nippon Columbia (NOS 1987) Denon DL-103. USA-made Shure SC35C with NOS stylus. Goldring G820 with NOS stylus. Shure M55E with NOS stylus.

    CD Player: Audiocom-modified Sony X-777ES/DAS-R1 DAC.

    Tape Deck: Tandberg TCD 310, fully restored and recalibrated as new, by RDE, plus upgraded with heads from the TCD-420a. Also with matching TM4 Norway microphones.

    Preamps: Heavily-modified Croft Charisma-X. LDR Stereo Coffee. Power Amps: Tube Distinctions Copper Amp fitted with Tungsol KT-150s. Quad 306.

    Cables & Sundries: Mark Grant HDX1 interconnects and digital coaxial cable, plus Mark Grant 6mm UP-LCOFC Van Damme speaker cable. MCRU 'Ultimate' mains leads. Lehmann clone headphone amp with vintage Koss PRO-4AAA headphones.

    Tube Distinctions digital noise filter. VPI HW16.5 record cleaning machine.

    Speakers: Tannoy 15MGs in Lockwood cabinets with modified crossovers. 1967 Celestion Ditton 15.


    Protect your HUMAN RIGHTS and REFUSE ANY *MANDATORY* VACCINE FOR COVID-19!

    Also **SAY NO** to unjust 'vaccine passports' or certificates, which are totally incompatible with a FREE society!!!


  3. #13
    Join Date: May 2008

    Location: A Strangely Isolated Place in Suffolk with Far Away Trains Passing By...

    Posts: 14,535
    I'm David.

    Default

    You devil you - bloomin' 66's.............
    Tear down these walls; Cut the ties that held me
    Crying out at the top of my voice; Tell me now if you can hear me

  4. #14
    Join Date: Aug 2010

    Location: Montseny National Park, Catalonia

    Posts: 3,254
    I'm John.

    Default

    Hmm, I don’t imagine many people know what their amps can manage by way of impedance, let alone know the capacitance per metre of their speaker cable, including connections.
    Some amps are quite happy with high capacitance speaker cables; some aren’t.
    I’m with Marco on this, balanced interconnects, yep fine, go as long as you need, unbalanced keep em short 0.5m or less, particularly between Dac and Pre and pre and power.
    Imo heavily screened interconnects fare better over longer runs, but if I was to have dual monos feeding speakers I would want balanced pre to power anyway.
    Not much point in spending good money on cables if you then go and ruin it all by getting the lengths all wrong and mismatched impedances in the chain.
    Just my opinion.
    Single spur balanced Mains. Self built music server with 3 seperate linear PSU, Intel i5, 16 GB RAM no hard drive (various Linux OS). Benchmark Dac2 HGC, single ended XLR interconnects/Belkin cable. Exposure 21RC Pre, Super 18 Power (recap & modified). Modded World Audio HD83 HP amp. Hand built Monitors with external crossovers , Volt 250 bass & ABR, Scanspeak 13M8621 Mid & Scanspeak D2905/9300 Hi. HD595 & Beyer 880 (600 ohm) cans.

    The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts.
    -Bertrand Russel

    John.

  5. #15
    Join Date: May 2008

    Location: A Strangely Isolated Place in Suffolk with Far Away Trains Passing By...

    Posts: 14,535
    I'm David.

    Default

    This was probably why AVI amps tended to be sold as sets, pre and power. The pre (a late S2000MP+P) was designed to drive long runs in any case, so in this instance, maybe I was spoiled, but the Audiolab 8000Q was also designed to do this and probably sounded sweeter when doing so for all I remember.

    I agree regarding balanced, but for normal minimal domestic use, I do argue against all that electronics (or iron-n-windings) added in... I remember the levinson ML28 preamp was fully balanced from input to output from memory, needing VERY closely matched components I remember. Nice preamp too and available for less than a grand still I think.
    Tear down these walls; Cut the ties that held me
    Crying out at the top of my voice; Tell me now if you can hear me

  6. #16
    Join Date: Aug 2010

    Location: Montseny National Park, Catalonia

    Posts: 3,254
    I'm John.

    Default

    Course, just to complicate things there are balanced outputs and then properly balanced amps as I have found out
    Single spur balanced Mains. Self built music server with 3 seperate linear PSU, Intel i5, 16 GB RAM no hard drive (various Linux OS). Benchmark Dac2 HGC, single ended XLR interconnects/Belkin cable. Exposure 21RC Pre, Super 18 Power (recap & modified). Modded World Audio HD83 HP amp. Hand built Monitors with external crossovers , Volt 250 bass & ABR, Scanspeak 13M8621 Mid & Scanspeak D2905/9300 Hi. HD595 & Beyer 880 (600 ohm) cans.

    The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts.
    -Bertrand Russel

    John.

  7. #17
    Join Date: Apr 2009

    Location: Near Saffron Walden, Essex

    Posts: 7,090
    I'm Dave.

    Default

    The Levinson amps are/were properly and fully balanced with each channel split into positive and negative to drive each half of the signal waveform. This has benefits in the sound but is diffiicult and very expensive to accomplish properly as each of the amps has to perform identically to the others.

    This is why the majority of balanced outputs/inputs are done by an IC or transformer and often sound worse than the single ended option.

    As for driving long runs of incon, say over 4-5 mtrs, many pre-amps will not give of their best as the output driver stage is not up to the job. All you can do is suck it and see...

  8. #18
    Join Date: Jan 2009

    Location: Essex

    Posts: 32,041
    I'm openingabottleofwine.

    Default

    It is always best to position the power amp close to the speakers and use short speaker cables. This is because the loop resistance of the speaker cable appears in series with the output impedance of the amplifier, thus reducing the damping factor, or the ability of the amplifier to control the speaker (or if you like, to 'stop the tail wagging the dog').

    The disadvantage of course is that then the connections between the pre- and power amplifier are long and the capacitance of the cable becomes an issue. For most modern amplifiers, especially solid-state, the output impedance of the pre- is very low whilst the input imput impedance is high so problems don't occur. Quad preamps, the 33 and 44, have a comparatively high source impedance of 1KOhm, but even then the maximum interconnect length is 30m (assuming a reasonable cable capacitance of 60pF/m). More modern preamps have source impedances of less than 100Ohm.

    Obviously the best way to go is to use balanced lines between pre- and power amp, however only a few systems support this, though it is becoming more prevalent.

    In my own system I use long and unequal speaker cables (6m and 16m respectively) and have had no problems, though I am now moving towards a system which will place the power amps (monoblocks) behind each speaker with balanced lines feeding them.
    Barry

  9. #19
    Join Date: May 2010

    Location: Vancouver, Canada

    Posts: 2,166
    I'm Alex.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Grand Wazoo View Post
    .........and this is a guy who sells cable?
    He'll probably also tell you that they must, at all costs, be the same length. That's another good way of selling you something that you don't necessarily need.
    No, he's the guy who's into cables, that's all. Makes his living via other channels.
    Don't you just hate it when you cannot detect where the post ends and a signature line begins?

    Alex.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •